The objective of these filters is to select the scientific waveband between 160 and 180 nm. The combined four mirrors have to give an out-of-band rejection ratio as high as possible to reject light from solar diffusion, dayglow and unwanted atomic lines in a range of 10-8 – 10-9. Different multilayer coatings are considered and optimized according to the π- multilayer equation for different H/L ratio and for different angles of incidence. Our theoretical evaluation shows a least a modification of the reflectance spectrum as a function of the angle of incidence, so that the optical beams hitting the different mirrors can have different optical properties depending on the optical fields and the distribution of the rays on the pupil. In this paper the effect of fields and coating homogeneity on the spectral throughput of the UVI instrument will be assessed and described. |
1.INTRODUCTIONSMILE (Solar wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer) is a joint mission between ESA and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) with a planned launch date in November 2021. The mission aims at increasing our understanding of the connection between the interaction of the Solar wind with the Earth magnetosphere by looking at the nose and cusps of the magnetosphere and the aurorae at the North pole simultaneously while monitoring the in-situ plasma environment. In particular, SMILE will:
The baseline orbit satisfying the science requirements is a Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) around the Earth with an apogee of 121000 km and a perigee of 5000 km. The inclination of the orbit should be > 63 degrees and the argument of perigee is around 270 degrees. This orbit ensures a long time around apogee for observing the regions of interest with a relatively low perigee for downloading the scientific data without diving too deep into Earth’s radiation belts. Nominal science operation is planned for 3 years. 1.1UVI instrument requirements and scientific goalThe scientific motivation for SMILE-UVI is to image the consequences of the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction and provide the most complete/highest resolution global images of the aurora ever taken. Data from SMILE-UVI will usher in a new era of geospace research. For the first time, researchers will track the causal chain of space weather through geospace, from the solar wind driver to its ultimate consequences in the radiation belts and ionosphere. Being the only global auroral imager during the mission timeframe, its data will be used for a multitude of reasons by researchers around the world. As discussed extensively in Donovan et al. [1], after nearly four decades of auroral imaging from space the result has been images with spatial resolution typically around 100 km, with temporal resolution of 30 seconds to two minutes (or longer). The historically low SNR of UV imagers leaves low-light level emissions undetected, due in part to low suppression of out-of-band signal results in low daylight suppression. Although auroral imaging from space has been tremendously important in the evolution of geospace science, in a very real sense we have only just begun to capitalize on the richness of opportunities that auroral imaging from space has to offer (see Figure 2). We have only limited information about the auroral distribution of time and space scales and how that distribution evolves in time. Our understanding of how the spatial extent of aurora of different types (e.g., patchy, Alfvenic, etc.) evolves in response to changing geospace conditions is very limited and in most cases comes from the partial view afforded by ground-based instruments. It is mandatory to increase the knowledge on key parameters such as the open flux in the polar cap through long duration geomagnetic events such as Steady Magnetospheric Convection and magnetic storms, which is one of the main goal of the SMILE mission. For SMILE, the baseline requirements for the UV images of Earth’s aurora have been set at 150 km or better spatial resolution from locations on orbit greater than 19 RE geocentric. The further requirements on detection of the dayside cusp and the polar cap boundary (from apogees) drive the high level specifications listed below; Table: 1High level SMILE-UVI specifications
To reach the spectral requirements of SMILE-UVI specific coatings are being developed. These filters are one of the key elements of the mission, directly coupled to the science objectives. These filters will be implemented as 4 reflective optical coatings made of thin film multilayers deposited on each mirror of the UVI. The objective of these filters is to select the scientific waveband between 160 and 180 nm. Out-of-band, the combined four mirrors have to give a rejection ratio as high as possible to reject light from solar diffusion, dayglow and unwanted atomic lines. The expected rejection ratio, all components combined (detector included) has to be in the range of 10-8 – 10-9. 2.UVI INSTRUMENT CONCEPTThe UV camera will consist of a single imaging system targeted at a portion of the Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) N2 wavelength band (160-180nm). The UVI utilizes a four mirror on-axis system with an intensified FUV CMOS-based camera. The optical design is represented on Figure 3. The design calls for thin film filter coatings to be deposited on each of the imaging mirrors to provide the vast majority of the signal filtering. Further filtering is accomplished via the detector (photocathode, window, MCP, and CMOS sensor). Preliminary system modeling shows that the combination of the four filtering surfaces, image intensifier and a CMOS sensor can readily accomplish the required out-of-band rejection required to image the aurora during sunlit conditions. The image-forming section of the camera comprises a fast, on-axis all-reflecting telescope with three spherical mirrors and one elliptical conical mirror (Figure 3). This type of reflecting telescope is very compact, and has excellent light gathering power. Moreover, it has excellent resolution over most of its FOV and has a high throughput in the far ultraviolet part of the spectrum. The camera has a FOV of 10°. The imager will operate in a self-filtering mode, utilizing thin film coatings on each of the four mirrors surfaces [4]. These filters, the topic of this paper, have very low reflectivity in the Visible and Near-UV region, and are specifically manufactured for high reflectivity in the LBH wavelength region, as required. 3.COATING OPTICAL DESIGNCompared to other UV-instruments where spectral selection is achieved with gratings [5-6], the challenge of the development of such instrument lies mainly on the performances of the coating deposition on the optical mirror surfaces. The π-multilayer technology [7-8] seems to be the most promising technology to realize such challenge. π-multilayer is defined as a periodic structure along the depth of the coating. They are composed of at least two materials with optical thicknesses called H and L. H is relative to a high-index film, while L is a low index material. Three periodic multilayers have been considered so far: MgF2/LaF3, Al/MgF2 and Al/LaF3. The latter has been excluded from the analysis because a too large fraction of the incident light flux is lost by absorption inside the coating giving the throughput too low. Moreover, these multilayers have been chosen to satisfy π-multilayer equation [7,8]: where H, L and λr account respectively for the highest refractive index material optical thickness at λr and the lowest refractive index material optical thickness at λr and the reference wavelength,. For the following computations, we set down λr = 170nm. Of course, if the light angle of incidence changes, H and L have to change accordingly in order to satisfy this equation. Therefore, each multilayer has to be optimized for one specific angle of incidence.
Theoretical analyses have been performed by using Transfer-matrix method [9] implemented on a homemade Matlab® code. 3.1Thin film materialsThis section presents the refractive index and extinction coefficient of each material involved in the coatings. They are depicted on Figure 4 to Figure 6. Due to a lack of information in the UV-visible range above 250 nm for LaF3, only Far-UV range is presented. However, a number of additional ellipsometry measurements in the UV-visible range (from 190 nm to 800 nm) are foreseen in the near future to be performed at CSL to evaluate the filter performances in the visible. 3.2Coating spectra optimized for normal incidenceThin film multilayers have been optimized according to π-multilayer equation for different H/L ratio and for different incidence angles. Reflectance spectra in the FUV region corresponding to multilayers optimized for normal incidence and specific values of H/L ratio are depicted below for each type of coatings. 3.3Angular dependency for a given coating stackOne of the main concern of interference filters is their dependencies with the incidence angle. While speaking about wide field telescope, one can be worried by the wide range of ray angles hitting the optical surfaces. Coating angular sensitivity has then to be considered. Coatings are optimized for a specific angle, let say θ = 10° in the present simulations which corresponds to the average incidence angle on the first mirror. However, ray analysis shows that minimum and maximum incidence angles are quite different, ranging from θ = 5° to θ =15° while keeping the same coating configuration, obviously. It turns out that coating performances are robust when the angle of incidence θ varies. There is no significant decrease of central wavelength throughput. The main effect is a wavelength shift of the spectral curve. In both coating types, the increase of the AOI blueshifts the curve maximum as shown on Figure 9. 4.COATING ON THE OPTICAL DESIGN: EFFECT OF FIELDS AND ANGLESAs the theoretical evaluation shows a modification of the reflectance spectrum as a function of the angle of incidence, it is right to think that the optical beam hitting the different mirrors can have different optical properties with the optical fields and with the rays distributed on the instrument pupil. This section intends to evaluate the effect of fields on spectral throughput due to different angles of incidence associated to fields and rays hitting location on mirrors. Both coating types (MgF2/Al and LaF3/MgF2) have been evaluated. 4.1MethodologyBased on the optical design of the UVI instrument, a first analysis of the angles of incidence distribution is performed for every field. This analysis is done with Code V. Along the rays and for each ray generated, a set of four angles of incidence (AOI) is calculated. These AOI will then be used to generate the spectral properties of the reflected beam through the optical telescope. The calculation is based on the fact that a ray contains all the spectral content and no wavelength dispersion occurs in the instrument. The spectral properties due to reflections along the rays are combined by multiplying the spectral response, while these responses are averaged over all the rays defining the fields and distributed over the entrance pupil. Results for central field is represented on Figure 10. Other fields have been analyzed. While central field has a symmetric profile around average angle because of on-axis instrument, off-axis fields present non-symmetric angle profile as depicted on Figure 11 and Figure 12. 4.2Throughput evaluationUsing the ray analysis preformed in the previous section and the coating performance evaluation tool presented in section 3, the throughput of each ray entering into the instrument can be evaluated. Ray throughput is averaged over the whole rays set entering through the instrument pupil. Each useful field is also analyzed. The following graphs (Figure 13 & Figure 14) present the spectral response of each individual reflection on the mirrors considering the specific angle of incidence associated to a specific ray. The dashed line corresponds to the equivalent filter response by all four mirrors and normalized to 1 mirror. Four specific rays are represented among a set of thousand rays. Figure 14 (left) represents the coatings response along all thousand rays after the four mirror reflections. The right-graph is the averaged responses on the (0,0)- field focal point. Results are presented in log-scale to highlight the depth of the coating reflectivity. On Figure 15 is represented the equivalent filter combining all the coating effects on the four mirrors. The same methodology has been applied on useful fields of view of the UVI-instrument. It is important to note that the filter response is quite similar for the three first mirror while the spectral reflectivity response of the fourth one is blueshifted. This effect is easily explained by the average angle of incidence which is approximately twice the angle of incidence of the three other mirrors. Figure 16 represents the spectral response for all fields. 5.CONCLUSIONThe present article exposes the concept of spectral selectivity with the aim of the interference coating to be placed on the UVI mirrors surfaces. Presently, two generic designs were analyzed: [MgF2/Al] and [LaF3/MgF2]. Both filters are considered as interferential filters and they are designed with the π-multilayer approach. These filters are then composed of a periodic stack assembly of two different materials (refractive index) and thicknesses. A period is based on the combination of both materials and their thickness. To converge to the best solution, the space of parameters (layers number, optical thicknesses ratio,…) has been explored. Interactions with the optical design have been calculated giving a simple conclusion: the spectral responses are quite similar over fields. The wide range of angles over the instrument does not modify significantly the spectral properties of the Instrument throughput. 6.6.REFERENCESDonovan, E., Trondsen, T., Spann, J., Liu, W., Spanswick, E.,
“Global auroral imaging in the ILWS era,”
Advances in Space Research, 40
(3), 409
–418
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.09.028 Google Scholar
Anger, C. D., Babey, S. K., Broadfoot, A. L., Brown, R. G., Cogger, L. L., Gattinger, R., … Jones, A. V.,
“An ultraviolet auroral imager for the Viking spacecraft,”
Geophysical Research Letters, 14
(4), 387
–390
(1987). https://doi.org/10.1029/GL014i004p00387 Google Scholar
S. B. Mende, H. Heetderk, H. U.Frey, M. Lampton, S. P. Geller, R. Abiad, O. H.W.Siegmund, A. S.Tremsin, J. Spann, H. Dougani, S. A. Fuselier, A. L. Magoncelli, M.B. Bumala, S. Murphree And T. Trondsen,
“Far Ultraviolet Imaging From The Image Spacecraft. 2. Wideband Fuv Imaging,”
Space Science Reviews, 91 271
–285
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005227915363 Google Scholar
Torr, M. R., Torr, D. G., Zukic, M., Johnson, R. B., Ajello, J., Banks, P, Spann, J.,
“A far ultraviolet imager for the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics Mission,”
Space Science Reviews, 71
(1–4), 329
–383
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751335 Google Scholar
Mende, S. B., Frey,
“The Far Ultra-Violet Imager on the Icon Mission,”
Space Science Reviews.,
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0386-0 Google Scholar
Loicq, J., Kintziger, C., Mazzoli, A., Miller, T., Chou, C., Frey, H. U., … Mende, S. B.,
“Optical design and optical properties of a VUV spectrographic imager for ICON mission,”
in Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering,
(2016). Google Scholar
Zukic, M., & Torr, D. G.,
“Multiple reflectors as narrow-band and broadband vacuum ultraviolet filters,”
Applied Optics, 31
(10), 1588
(1992). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.31.001588 Google Scholar
Wang, X. D., Chen, B., Wang, H. F., He, F., Zheng, X., He, L. P., Li, Y. P.,
“Design and fabrication of far ultraviolet filters based on π-multilayer technology in high-k materials,”
Scientific Reports, 5 1
–6
(2015). Google Scholar
M. Lequine and C. Amra,
“De l’Optique électromagnétique à l’Interférométrie,”
EDP Sciences,
(2013). Google Scholar
M. Zukic, D. G. Torr, J. F. Spann, and M. R. Torr, App. Opt., 29
(28), 4284
–4292
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.29.004284 Google Scholar
|