Poster + Paper
4 April 2022 Quantitative comparison of dual-energy CT and differential phase contrast CT imaging methods
Author Affiliations +
Conference Poster
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the quantitative imaging performance of the dual-energy CT (DECT) and differential phase contrast CT (DPCT). The electron density (ρe) and the effective atomic number (Zeff) are selected as the two comparison bases for the DECT and DPCT imaging. From the numerically simulated data, image domain based decomposition algorithms are used to extract the ρe and Zeff information for three different spatial resolution levels (0.3 mm, 0.1 mm, and 0.03 mm). The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and modeled human observer studies have been investigated to compare the DECT and DPCT quantitative imaging performance. At low spatial resolution (0.3 mm), the DECT shows better quantitative imaging performance than DPCT. As a contrary, the DPCT outperforms the DECT for ultra high spatial resolution (0.03 mm) imaging. With the 0.1 mm spatial resolution, the DECT and DPCT shows similar quantitative imaging performance. In conclusion, the DECT is more favored for low spatial resolution applications, such as the diagnostic imaging tasks. However, the DPCT would be recommended for ultra high spatial resolution imaging tasks, such as the micro-CT imaging tasks.
© (2022) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Xin Zhang, Ting Su, Dongmei Xia, Dong Liang, and Yongshuai Ge "Quantitative comparison of dual-energy CT and differential phase contrast CT imaging methods", Proc. SPIE 12031, Medical Imaging 2022: Physics of Medical Imaging, 120313P (4 April 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2611688
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
X-ray computed tomography

Spatial resolution

X-rays

Imaging systems

Phase contrast

X-ray imaging

Dual energy imaging

Back to Top