Open Access Paper
15 January 2025 Quantitative analysis of the emission reduction potential of information and communication technology on agriculture
Juanjuan Feng, Yonglian Weng, Shuo Chen, Tianjian Yang
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 13513, The International Conference Optoelectronic Information and Optical Engineering (OIOE2024); 1351313 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045446
Event: The International Conference Optoelectronic Information and Optical Engineering (OIOE2024), 2024, Wuhan, China
Abstract
With the development and maturity of Information and Communication Technology(ICT), the concept of industrial empowerment has been frequently mentioned. As the primary economic industry in the national economy, agriculture also benefits from the ICTs’ capability of enabling energy saving and emission reduction. Three typical scenarios where ICT enabling the agricultural industry to reduce carbon emissions are studied, emission reductions are calculated by GHG protocol methods. And future emission reduction potentials of smart agriculture ICTs are also estimated. The important carbon reduction role of ICTs in the field of agricultural is identified and important management insights are concluded.

1.

INTRODUCTION

ICT has been widely applied, it improves efficiency of many traditional industries and reduces energy use and emission. As a main part of the national economy, agriculture also benefits from ICTs. For exampls, ICTs can stabilize or increase crop yield while using less fertilizer and water. But few researchers have reported the enablement effect of ICTs in these agricultural scenarioes. China Telecom, one of the largest telecom operators in China, provides a large variety of ICTs. Thus, we conduct a survey of agricultural ICTs from Telecom China in order to quantify the CO2 emission reduction effect in the agricultural sector, and forecast their future potential.

In 2018, the GSMA team estimated that ICTs promoted the transformation of agricultural informatization, and 54.9Mt of carbon dioxide emission was reduced[1]. It also estimated the reduced carbon emissions by recognizing different degrees of agricultural informatization in different regions of the world. The SMARTer 2020 team predicted a total emission reduction potential of 9.1GtCO2e for ICT applications in six fields: electricity, transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, construction, services, and consumption, which is 7 times its own emissions[2]. The SMARTer2030 team calculated the emission reductions in different industry sectors enabled by ICTs around the world. By 2030, the emission reduction potential in the agricultural sector is reported be about 2.0Gt of carbon dioxide, accounting for 16.53% of the total carbon reduction[3]. GeSI also concluded that China’s ICT use can achieve a 22% -65% emission reduction in the future agricultural sector[4]. Zhu and Wang studied influcing factors of agricultural CO2e emissions, and found that the level of mechanization, the improvement of fertilizer and irrigation can reduce emissions of crop management [5]. However, existing literatures only discussed emission reduction of ICT-enabled planting in agriculture, while our paper also examines the use of ICT in fisheries and livestock.

2.

METHODOLOGY AND CASE SELECTION

2.1

GHG Protocol for Project Accounting

To estimate the emission reduction of ICT-enabled agricultural cases, the life cycle analysis (LCA) and GHG Protocol for Project Account are adopted in this paper[6]. Based on GHG Protocol, ISO also developed ISO 14064-2 for project accounting[7]. The GHG protocol issued by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) is a welknown principle, which includes GHG Protocol for Project Accounting and GHG Protocol for Corporate Accounting. ICT use cases in agriculure are defined as individual projects. By comparing emission changes between baseline and the reporting period, emission reduction can be calculated. Yang et al. adopted GHG Protocol method to estimate ICT-enabled low carbon solutions from China Mobile, but ICT use cases in agriculture were not discussed yet [8].

How to define the baseline is the key of the calculation. Two methods are adopted, that is Before-and-after comparison (BAC) and With-and-without comparison (WOC).

  • 1. BAC method: When the ICT is applied in the crop management case, fertilizer and water can be saved significantly. Thus, the situation before ICT application is defined as the baseline period.

  • 2. WOC method: In a ICT use case for smart ranches, although there was no significant change in energy and feed in the pasture, the number of cattle slaughtered increased significantly due to the reduction of missed breeding and slaughter opportunities. In this case, the energy consumption with the same output level under the original condition is used as the baseline period.

2.2

Case Selection

Three ICT use cases in agriculture are selected in order to cover typical main ICT-enabled scenarios. these are smart crop management, smart pasture and smart aquaculture as Table 1 shows.

Table 1.

Field classification and selected ICT smart agriculture application scenarios

Aricultural ScenePrinciple of realizing emission reductionMethods
Smart plantingReduce the use of agricultural irrigation water and chemical fertilizersBAC
Smart pastureImprove breeding and reduce average time to marketWOC
Smart aquacultureReduce the energy used by adding oxygen to fish pondsBAC

3.

CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS

3.1

Emission Reduction Calculation

3.1.1

Smart crop management (CM)

Smart crop management mainly refers to the digital management of planting areas by using 5G, Internet of Things, and even cloud computing and big data technologies. The dynamic data collection of climate, soil, crops and pests is realized by setting up sensors, and feeding of water and fertilizer can be optimized by intelligent controlers. Peasants can review important data and monitor by a real time manner on their smart phones.

The automatical system of feeding water and fertilizer to crops can realize energy saving and emission reduction by several ways. First, the use of chemical fertilizers can be reduced through lean fertilization technology, while improving the nutrient absorption efficiency of crops, reducing the waste of fertilizers, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Secondly, intelligent irrigation technology can achieve precise watering, reduce water consumption, prevent soil loss and land drought, and increase the effect of soil conservation. Finally, the water-and-fertilizer-integrated automated system can collect data and is driven by models, which can optimize agricultural production. In the field survey, based on the carbon reduction effect and planting range, five kinds of crops with mature informatization and wide planting ranges were selected to estimate the ICT-enabled emission reduction effect, namely pericarpium citri reticulatae, pineapple, orchid, orange and rice.

Emission reduction of smart CM = farm area * average water consumption intensity * water saving ratio * emission coefficient of agricultural water + farm area * average fertilizer use intensity * fertilizer saving ratio * emission coefficient of fertilizer production.

Table 2.

Annual emission reduction from water saving in smart crop management for a pilot project

CoefficientsValues
Planting area of pericarpium citri reticulatae (thousand mu)97.9
Planting area of orchid (thousand mu)35
Annual water consumption per mu of pericarpium citri reticulatae (tons)123
Annual water consumption per mu of orchid (tons)90
Average water saving ratio of pericarpium citri reticulatae30%
Average water saving ratio of orchid45%
CO2 emissions from one ton of agricultural water (kg/ton)0.26
The quatity of water saved for one year (tons)5030010
CO2 emissions from all saved agricultural water (tons)1307.80

Note: Mu is a Chinese area unit and 100 mu is equal to 6.66 hectares.

Table 3.

Annual emission reduction of fertilizer saved in crop management for a pilot project

CoefficientsValues
Planting area of chenpi (thousand mu)97.9
Planting area of orchid (thousand mu)35
Planting area of pineapple (thousand mu)280
Planting area of orange (thousand mu)100
Planting area of rice (thousand mu)23.2
Annual consumption of nitrogen fertilizer for chenpi for one year (tons / mu)0.08
Annual consumption of nitrogen fertilizer for pineapple for one year (tons / mu)1.28
Annual consumption of nitrogen fertilizer for rice for one year (tons / mu)0.05
Annual consumption of phosphate fertilizer for chenpi for one year (tons / mu)1.28
Annual consumption of potash fertilizer of chenpi for one year (tons / mu)0.08
Annual consumption of potash fertilizer for pineapple for one year (tons / mu)1.28
CO2 emissions generated by phosphate fertilizer production (kg/ton)2.33
CO2 emissions generated by nitrogen fertilizer production (kg/ton)10.63
CO2 emissions generated by potash fertilizer production (kg/ton)0.66
The average proportion of chemical fertilizers saved in the chenpi industrial park30%
The average proportion of chemical fertilizers saved in the orchid industrial park10%
The average proportion of chemical fertilizers saved in the pineapple industrial park10%
The average proportion of chemical fertilizers saved in the orange industrial park10%
The average proportion of chemical fertilizers saved for rice planting25%
CO2 emission saved by all agricultural industrial parks (tons)2419

Note: Mu is a Chinese area unit and 100 mu is equal to 6.66 hectares.

3.1.2

Smart aquaculture (SAq)

Smart aquaculture is a new benchmark of modern aquaculture based on 5G, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and artificial intelligence (AI). It collects and analyzes environment data under water, such as water quality, temperature, and dissolved oxygen, as well as production data, such as bait feeding and fish activities, in order to realize intelligent and fine management. After the digital fish farming system is applied, functions such as continuious monitoring of the water environment, fine oxygenation of water areas, precise feeding, health management and remote control of fisheries can be realized. Among these activities, adding oxygen to water properly has a much more obvious effect of energy saving and emission reduction.

The activity of adding oxygen into water need to monitor the water quality online and optimally control the operation of an aerator, which greatly reduces unnecessary waste of motors’ energy.

Emission reduction of SAq = application area of SAq * (annual power consumption intensity of oxygen enhancement before SAq applies - annual power consumption intensity of oxygen enhancement after SAq applies) * emission factor of power grid

Table 4.

Calculation process of emission reduction in smart aquaculture

CoefficientsValues
Usage area of smart aquaculture (mu)1920000
Electricity consumption cost of oxygen inhancement per mu before applying SAq (yuan)6000
Electricity consumption cost of oxygen increase per mu after applying SAq (yuan)5000
Average electricity charge (yuan/Kwh)0.48
Annual electricity saved by SAq (Mwh)2800000
Emission factor of China’s power grid industry (tCO2/MWh)0.581
SAq emission reduction (tons)1626800

Note: Mu is a Chinese area unit and 100 mu is equal to 6.66 hectares.

3.1.3

Smart pasture (SPa)

Smart pasture is an ICT application for animal husbandry management based on 5G, IoT, big data and AI. It realizes the automation and intelligence of animal husbandry by collecting and analyzing data of environment, feed nutrition and animal behavior in the pasture. Smart pasture can also realize animal intelligent feeding, animal disease monitoring and prevention, animal estrus monitoring, and pasture environmental management. By these functions, efficient feeding and timely breeding can be realized, the period before slaughtering can be reduced, meat yield of the pasture can be improved. Besides, by using ICT to improve breeding of milk cows, the milk production has been greatly improved. If the ICT was not applied, the farm had to increase the keeping number of dairy cows to maintain the same output, which meaned more emissions would be emited.

Table 5.

Emission reduction estimation of smart milk cow management

CoefficientsValues
Number of cows covered by Spa (head)5000
Before applying SPa, the annual milk yield per cow (ton)5
After applying SPa, the annual milk yield per cow (ton)12
Daily greenhouse gas emissions per cow (kg of methane)0.28572
The number of teduction of cows using SPa7000
Reduced annual CO2 by SPa (tons)15330.31

Table 6.

Emission reduction estimation of smart beef cattle management

CoefficientsValues
Number of beef cattle covered by Spa (head)3000
Before applying SPa, the the feeding cycle of each beef cattle (month)20.5
After applying SPa, the the feeding cycle of each beef cattle (month)15.5
After using SPa, the production increase of beef cattle within the same period32%
The equivalent number of beef cattle reduction29%
Daily GHG emissions per beef cow (kg of methane)0.25
Reduced annual CO2 emission by SPa use (tons)14021.62

3.2

ICT-enabled Emission Reduction Potential of Smart Agriculture

Agriculture is devided into four scenarios in this paper. Thus, in order to further study the emission reduction potential of ICT usage in the whole agricultural sector, we can multiply emission reduction intensity of an ICT pilot use case and its national potential usage scale.

Table 7.

The application scope of smart agriculture throughout China

Aricultural SceneNational totalEmission reduction potential brought by the nationwide application of ICT solutions (tons)
Smart crops management (thousand mu)29921.259636691.75
Smart aquaculture (mu)7009.3889084838.94
Smart pasture for milk cows (head)615018856277.12
Smart pasture for beef cattle (head)4707021999924.75
Total189577732.6

Note: Smart crops management here only envolves data of national-wide rice planting

The CO2 emissions generated by China’s agricultural sector account for approximately 7% of the annual national total amount. However, the 2022 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Report released by the International Energy Agency (IEA) shows that China’s total carbon emissions in 2022 were approximately 11477 million tons, and it is estimated that China’s agricultural industry’s carbon dioxide emissions in 2022 were approximately 803.39 million tons proportionally. Assuming the comprehensive promotion of ICTs in smart crop management, smart aquaculture and smart pastures nationwide, it is expected that the reduced CO2 emissions will account for approximately 23.60% of the total emissions of the agriculture sector. This also shows that the smart agriculture enabled by ICTs has a great potential in the field of energy conservation and emission reduction, and is one of the important ways for the future agricultural industry to achieve carbon neutrality.

4.

CONCLUSION AND SUBSEQUENT RESEARCH

This article surveyed four typical agricultural ICT use cases (smart crop management, smart aquaculture and smart pasture etc.) provided by China Telecom and adopted GHG Protocol method to calculate the CO2 emission reduction potential of ICT-enabled smart agriculture. And two methods for estimating baselines are put forward. Results show that ICT-enabled smart agriculture can bring about approximately 23% CO2 emission reduction in a nationwide manner. However, it should be noted that the estimation is only roughly estimated. Due to certain differences in natural environmental conditions across China, there may be regional differences in CO2 reduction potential among different regions. And the regional differences in carbon reduction can be further studied.

REFERENCES

[1] 

GSMA, “The Enablement Effect: The impact of mobile communications technologies on carbon emission reductions,” (2019). Google Scholar

[2] 

SMARTer 2020 team, “GeSI SMARTer 2020: The Role of ICT in Driving a Sustainable Future,” 12 (2012). Google Scholar

[3] 

SMARTer 2030 team, “GeSI SMARTer 2030: ICT Solutions for 21st Century challenges,” 12 (2015). Google Scholar

[4] 

GeSI, “Digital Solutions for Climate Action,” 12 (2020). Google Scholar

[5] 

Zhu Wei, Wang Ruimei, “Research on the Impact of Technological Progress and Business Scale on Agricultural Carbon Emissions,” Agricultural Economy, (02), 13 –15 (2023). Google Scholar

[6] 

WBCSD, WRI, The GHG Protocol for Project Accounting, (2005). Google Scholar

[7] 

ISO, “Greenhouse gases - Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements,” (2008). Google Scholar

[8] 

Yang Tianjian, Hu Yiwen, Zheng Ping, Shu Huaying, Liu Xi, “Low-carbon telecom solution for China ’ s emission reduction and future forecasts,” China Communications, (5), 52 –65 (2011). Google Scholar
(2025) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Juanjuan Feng, Yonglian Weng, Shuo Chen, and Tianjian Yang "Quantitative analysis of the emission reduction potential of information and communication technology on agriculture", Proc. SPIE 13513, The International Conference Optoelectronic Information and Optical Engineering (OIOE2024), 1351313 (15 January 2025); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045446
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
Back to Top