Open Access Paper
15 January 2025 Research progress on forage crop growth monitoring by remote sensing
Jing Xu, Qingsong Liu, Xudong Yan, Yupeng Xu, Mimi Shi
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 13513, The International Conference Optoelectronic Information and Optical Engineering (OIOE2024); 135131G (2025) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045534
Event: The International Conference Optoelectronic Information and Optical Engineering (OIOE2024), 2024, Wuhan, China
Abstract
Monitoring the forage crop growth by remote sensing can reveal its growth status and dynamic changes from a macro perspective so that it can provide rapid and accurate reference for scientific management and sustainable utilization of forage crop. This paper introduced the principle, method and vegetation indexes of the remote sensing monitoring of forage crop. It summarized the application of remote sensing technology in forage crop growth monitoring and pointed out the main existing problems and technical bottlenecks. Meanwhile, it put forward prospects for the development direction of the future so as to provide a scientific reference for remote sensing monitoring of forage crop.

1.

INTRODUCTION

The forage crop industry is an important part of modern agriculture and an important focus for adjusting and optimizing China’s agricultural structure[1]. In 2020, forage crops grown in China mainly included silage corn, forage oats, annual ryegrass, and alfalfa, with a cultivated area of nearly 5.4 million hectares and a dry weight of about 71.6 million tons, an increase of about 24 million tons over 2015[2]. Forage crops are a renewable resource, and rapid monitoring of their growth and yield is indispensable for scientific management and sustainable use. It is of great scientific significance to carry out the research and application of rapid and accurate monitoring methods for the growth of forage crops, which is of great scientific significance for the management and protection of forage resources and the improvement of the ecological environment.

Growth is an important basis for predicting forage crop yield. Traditionally, ground manual surveys have been used to measure vegetation growth information such as vegetation coverage, height, development period, and grass yield of forage crops[3]. This method is time-consuming, laborious, limited in coverage, and greatly affected by human factors, which cannot quickly and comprehensively reflect the temporal and spatial variability of large-scale planting areas, which affects the timeliness of formulating forage resource management measures[4]. Remote sensing monitoring of forage crop growth is a macroscopic dynamic monitoring of growth status, process, and yield in a large area by using remote sensing methods combined with ground observation and climate reality[5], which has the characteristics of high timeliness, wide coverage, short detection period, few human interference factors, and low cost, which provides a new technical method for large-scale, rapid and accurate monitoring of forage crop growth[6].

2.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF REMOTE SENSING MONITORING IN FORAGE CROP GROWTH

2.1

Growth Monitoring Index

Plant growth requires leaf photosynthesis, and leaf area index(LAI) is a comprehensive index closely related to crop growth characteristics. Since the near-infrared and red bands of remote sensing images are sensitive to vegetation characteristics, the vegetation index formed by the combination of these two bands can be used to backcalculate the leaf area index of vegetation[7], and then estimate the growth of crops. Commonly used vegetation indices in the inversion process include Normalized Vegetation Index(NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Vertical Vegetation Index (PVI), and Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI), among which Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI) is the most commonly used and has good results[8]. The Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI) can partially eliminate the effects of solar altitude angle, sensor observation angle, and atmosphere, making the results more accurate, but it has the disadvantage of being sensitive to changes in vegetation coverage and is not suitable for areas with low and oversaturated vegetation coverage[9]. Due to differences in natural conditions, different vegetation indices may be suitable for different forage crop planting types[10]. LI et al.[11] compared different natural grasslands and found that RVI had a better correlation with fresh grass yield than NDVI for montane desert steppe, lowland and montane meadows, but the opposite was true for plain desert grasslands. The results of YU et al.[12] and Fu et al.[13] showed that NDVI and EVI were more accurate in estimating grassland yield for most alpine grasslands. Compared with other vegetation indices, NDVI and SAVI are more suitable for monitoring grassland growth in the northern agro-pastoral ecotone[14].

2.2

Principles of Remote Sensing Monitoring

As the basis for the analysis and interpretation of remote sensing data, the spectral characteristics of ground objects are studied, and the basis for the selection of sensor bands is also designed. The spectral curves of healthy green vegetation show obvious “peak-valleys”: there is a high reflection zone in the near-infrared band, chlorophyll has a strong absorption of visible light, and there are troughs in the spectral curve near 450 nm and 680 nm, with peaks around 550 nm. The degree of development, water content, and chlorophyll content of each leaf are different, which makes the absorption and reflection of incident light different, so the spectral information is closely related to vegetation biomass[15]. Remote sensing yield estimation is to analyze the optical properties of plant leaves and measure their reflectance in different wavebands according to the spectral curve, and analyze the relationship with yield through modeling, so as to estimate yield[16]. The growth and development stage, pests and diseases, nutrient content and water and fertilizer deficit of forage crops can be well reflected by the spectral characteristics of remote sensing images. Remote sensing imaging can be used to obtain dense and information-rich datasets without contact, and various physical and biochemical parameters of forage crops can be inverted by combining spectral data analysis and processing methods[17], as shown in Figure 1.

Figure.1

The process of monitoring forage crop growth by by remote sensing

00052_PSISDG13513_135131G_page_2_1.jpg

2.3

Methods of Remote Sensing Monitoring

At present, the remote sensing monitoring methods of forage growth are mostly used for remote sensing monitoring of crop growth. The remote sensing monitoring methods mainly include the direct monitoring method, the vegetation growth process curve method, the contemporaneous comparison method, and the percentile method based on NDVI[18].

  • (1) Direct monitoring method: It refers to the direct use of remote sensing inversion of vegetation index and forage crop vegetation growth correlation analysis, and find out the relationship between the two[19] to determine vegetation growth and divide vegetation growth grades. This method is mainly to establish the correlation between the vegetation index and the ecological parameters of vegetation (density, height, etc.) or the agronomic parameters of crops by remote sensing to analyze the growth situation. However, due to the different sensitivities of different vegetation indices to vegetation coverage, better monitoring results can be obtained by using corresponding vegetation indices in different vegetation periods.

  • (2) Vegetation growth process curve method: plant growth is a gradual process with time, according to the time series statistics of the average value of the vegetation index of forage crops in the monitoring area by remote sensing, that is, to construct the change process curve of the vegetation index of forage in the monitoring area with time, through the comparison of the growth process of forage crops in the current year and the growth curve of the reference year, to evaluate the growth of the current year is better than, equal to or worse than the reference year.

  • (3) Comparison method for the same period: that is, the vegetation index of forage remote sensing monitoring of the current year is subtracted from the vegetation index of remote sensing monitoring of the same period of last year or a reference year to obtain the change of vegetation growth compared with the reference year, and the corresponding threshold is set according to the difference result, and the growth of forage crops is divided into: better than the reference year, the same as the reference year, and worse than the reference year.

    It can be calculated as follows:

    00052_PSISDG13513_135131G_page_3_1.jpg

    where: ΔNDVI is the difference between the vegetation index of forage crops in the current year and the reference year, NDVIm is the vegetation index value of the current year, and NDVIn is the vegetation index value of forage crops in the reference year.

  • (4) Percentile method based on NDVI: Considering the influence of land use change in different periods and the uncertainty of crop growth in the reference year on the monitoring and evaluation in the comparison method over the same period, Li et al.[20] proposed a percentile evaluation method using NDVI big data of crops in the same period of many years, so as to realize the quantitative remote sensing monitoring and evaluation of crop growth. The percentile method based on NDVI uses the big data of NDVI of similar features in the same period for many years, and analyzes and obtains the corresponding percentile of any NDVI value in this big data, so as to realize the quantitative evaluation of its growth. Establish an NDVI percentile lookup table for the same period in recent years. The calculation formula is as follows:

    00052_PSISDG13513_135131G_page_3_2.jpg

    Compared with the remote sensing monitoring of crop growth, the research on remote sensing monitoring of forage vegetation is relatively weak, and the research on the suitability of these methods in the monitoring of forage vegetation growth and the difference in the reflection of growth results will be helpful to the application and development of remote sensing technology in the monitoring of forage crop growth.

3.

APPLICATION OF REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY IN FORAGE CROP GROWTH MONITORING

The application of remote sensing observation to crop monitoring and yield estimation began in the 70s of the last century, but the coupling of crop models and remote sensing observations began in the late 80s of the last century. Since 1996, Canada has monitored crop growth by comparing the NDVI curve with weekly growth changes[21]. Since 1998, the European Union has developed a growth monitoring method based on the NDVI change process based on the CORINE1:100,000 land use database[22]. In China, in the early nineties of the twentieth century, Huang et al.[23-25] began to study and model the relationship between natural grassland yield and satellite data. In 2008, Mao et al.[26] studied the relationship between forage yield and vegetation index NDVI, and established a linear model and an exponential model with good fitting results, and estimated forage yield in Qinghai Province. Qian et al.[27] analyzed the trends of grassland area and yield in Fukang City, Xinjiang over a period of 20 years (1990, 1999 and 2008) based on remote sensing classification and yield estimation models. In 2020, Yu et al.[28] combined ground monitoring data and high-resolution images to establish an inversion model to analyze the changes of nutrient content in natural grassland. Based on the previous data of satellite remote sensing monitoring, the relationship between vegetation index and forage crop yield is studied and established at point and surface, and remote sensing technology is an effective means to estimate the grass yield of forage crops on a large spatial scale.

4.

MAIN TECHNICAL BOTTLENECK AT PRESENT

Although the latest remote sensing technologies such as hyperspectral have the advantages of rapid, non-destructive and accurate detection, there are still some technical bottlenecks in the monitoring of forage crop growth, which limit their wide application.

First of all, remote sensing satellites have a long revisit period, low resolution, and are susceptible to weather and terrain, especially in areas where optical remote sensing is difficult to apply to cloudy and rainy areas, and there are homogeneous and homomorphic foreign bodies in a small number of areas[29], which is unavoidable for optical remote sensing interpretation.

Second, the resolution of the remote sensing data used is generally tens of meters, 100 meters and below, and the precision and accuracy have not fully met the needs, and there are still certain difficulties in the ground verification of remote sensing monitoring of forage crop growth. To improve the accuracy and reliability of monitoring, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on the temporal and spatial resolution of remote sensing images, the quantitative processing of remote sensing, and the growth mechanism of forage crops[9].

Thirdly, most of the researchers engaged in remote sensing monitoring of forage crop growth are engaged in remote sensing monitoring or forage crop science, the former lacks in-depth research on the growth mechanism of forage crops, and the latter lacks the breadth and depth of remote sensing spectroscopy professional and technical personnel in remote sensing applications, how to promote the deep integration of remote sensing technology and forage crop science to improve the accuracy of monitoring and the training of interdisciplinary professionals still has a long way to go in the future.

5.

PROSPECT

Although there are not many studies on the application of remote sensing technology to monitor the physiological indicators and environmental stress of forage vegetation, and there is a lack of spectral database of forage crops, we can learn from the experience gained by remote sensing technology in the production of other crops, combine the growth characteristics of forage crops, make up for the shortcomings of traditional monitoring technology, and initially realize fast and non-destructive forage growth monitoring. Promoting the deep integration of remote sensing technology and grassland science to improve the accuracy of monitoring and the training of interdisciplinary professionals will lay the foundation for the realization of digital forage monitoring. In the next ten years, with the launch of more and more high-resolution domestic satellites and the in-depth implementation of high-resolution special projects, the construction of national space infrastructure will be further promoted. With the development of big data, artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, Internet+ and other technologies, remote sensing technology will develop rapidly in the field of forage crop growth monitoring, multi-source remote sensing data fusion, interdisciplinary improvement of monitoring accuracy, artificial intelligence and big data applications.

6.

6.

REFERENCES

[1] 

Liang Qizhang, Qi Qingwen, Jiang Lili, et al., “Optimization method of planting structure of “grain & economic & feed crop” and playing chess operation strategy of software platform,” China Agricultural Informatics, 31 (2), 84 –97 (2019). Google Scholar

[2] 

Zhuo Yue, Ding Feng, Yan Haijun, et al., “Advances in forage crop growth monitoring by UAV remote sensing,” Smart Agriculture, 4 (04), 35 –48 (2022). Google Scholar

[3] 

Rao Xinyu, Li Hongjun, Zhang Shengwei, et al., “Suitability analysis of remote sensing monitoring methods for grassland vegetation growth,” Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 29 (12), 2084 –2092 (2021). Google Scholar

[4] 

Gao Tian, Yang Xiu Chun, Jin Yun Xiang, et al., “Spatio-temporal variation in vegetation biomass and its relationships with climate factors in the Xilingol grasslands, Northern China,” PLoS One, 8 (12), e83824 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083824 Google Scholar

[5] 

Xu Bin, Tao Weiguo, Yang Xiuchun, et al., “MODIS-Based remote sensing monitoring upon the vegetation growth of China’s grassland,” Acta Agrestia Sinica, 14 (3), 242 –247 (2006). Google Scholar

[6] 

Fang Chen, Hu Fei, Chen Xi, et al., “Advances in Application of Remote Sensing to Natural Resources,” Resources Environment & Engineering, 33 (4), 563 –569 (2019). Google Scholar

[7] 

Liu Liangyun, “Principles and applications of quantitative remote sensing of vegetation,” Science Press, Beijing (2014). Google Scholar

[8] 

Pidgorodetska L V, Zyelyk Y I., “Detection of winter crops by satellite data on the basis of soil-adaptive perpendicular vegetation index,” Astronomical School’s Report, 11 (1), 91 –98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-6602.11.1091 Google Scholar

[9] 

Xu Bin, Tao Guowei, Yang Xiuchun, et al., “Monitoring by remote sensing of vegetation growth in the project of grassland withdrawn from grazing in counties of China,” Acta Prataculturae Sinica, (05), 13 –21 (2007). Google Scholar

[10] 

Zhang Yangjian, Fan Chunkun, Huang Ke, et al., “Opportunities and challenges in remote sensing applications to ecosystem ecology,” Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36 (3), 809 –823 (2017). Google Scholar

[11] 

Li J L, Liang T G, Chen Q G., “Estimating grassland yields using remote sensing and GIS technologies in China,” New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 41 (1), 31 –38 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1998.9513285 Google Scholar

[12] 

Yu L, Zhou L, Liu W, Zhou H K., “Using remote sensing and GIS technologies to estimate grass yield and livestock carrying capacity of alpine grasslands in Golog Prefecture, China,” Pedosphere, 20 (3), 342 –351 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60023-9 Google Scholar

[13] 

Fu Xinyu, Tang Chuanjiang, Zhang Xinyue, et al., “Estimation of grass yield based on MODIS data in Sichuan province, China,” Journal of Geo-information Science, 15 (4), 611 –617 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00611 Google Scholar

[14] 

Yang Xiuchun, Xu Bin, Zhu Xiaohua, et al., “Models of grass producti on based on re mote sensing monitoring in northern agro-grazing ecotone,” Geographical Research, 2007 (2), 213 –221 Google Scholar

[15] 

Zhao Yingshi, “Principles and Methods of Remote Sensing Application Analysis,” 366 –396 Science Press, Beijing (2003). Google Scholar

[16] 

Ren Haijuan, “Application of remotely sensed images on alfalfa grassland discrimination and yield estimation,” Inner Mongolia University,2016). Google Scholar

[17] 

Xing Luqi, Zhang Guilian, Zhang Lang, et al., “Application of hyperspectral technique in monitoring vegetation characteristics,” Landscape Architecture Academic Journal, 2020 (11), 8 –14 Google Scholar

[18] 

Sun Li, Wang Weidan, Chen Yuanyuan, et al., “Analysis of winter wheat growth of united states with remote sensing data in 2019,” Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 48 (1), 241 –244 (2020). Google Scholar

[19] 

Meng Jihua, “Research to crop growth monitoring indicators with remote sensing,” Institute of Remote Sensing ApplicationsChinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (2006). Google Scholar

[20] 

Li C C, Li H J, Li J Z, Lei Y P, Li C Q, Manevski K, Shen Y J., “Using NDVI percentiles to monitor real-time crop growth[J],” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162 357 –363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.026 Google Scholar

[21] 

Wu Bingfang, Zhang Feng, Liu Chenglin, et al., “An Integrated Method for Crop Condition Monitoring,” National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2004 (06), 498 –514 Google Scholar

[22] 

Genovese G,Vignolles C,Nègre T,Passera G, “A methodology for a combined use of normalized difference vegetation index and CORINE land cover data for crop yield monitoring and forecasting,” A case study on Spain. Agronomie, 21 (1), 91 –111 (2001). Google Scholar

[23] 

Huang Jingfeng, Sang Changqing, “The remote sensing dynamic monitoring model for grass yield of natural grassland in the north slope of Tianshan Mountains,” Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, (02), 53 –59 (1993). Google Scholar

[24] 

Huang Jingfeng, Hu Xinbo, “Studies on grass yield monitoring and predicting models of natural grassland using remote sensing data in Northern Xinjiang,” Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 25 (2), 125 –129 (1999). Google Scholar

[25] 

Huang Jingfeng, Cai Chengxia, “Using NOAA/AVHRR data monitoring natural grassland productivity in the northern Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region,” Pratacultural Science, 1999 (5), 62 –69 Google Scholar

[26] 

Mao Liuxi, Hou Yingyu, Qian Shuan, et al., “Estimation of pasture output and livestock carrying capacity using remote sensing,” Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 24 (8), 147 –151 (2008). Google Scholar

[27] 

Qian Yurong, Yang Feng, Li Jianlong, et al., “Yield and animal-feed balance of typical grassland in Xinjiang Fukang using 3S Techniques,” Pratacultural Science, 30 (9), 1330 –1337 (2013). Google Scholar

[28] 

Yu Lu, Wang Xun, Chai Shatuo, et al., “Seasonal dynamic inversion of natural grassland forage content based on high-resolution satellite remote sensing,” Acta Agrestia Sinica, 28 (2), 547 –557 (2020). Google Scholar

[29] 

Zhang Weiwei, Wang Kai, “Object-oriented rice planting information extraction with wide band imagery,” Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 37 (07), 1051 –1055 (2023). Google Scholar
(2025) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Jing Xu, Qingsong Liu, Xudong Yan, Yupeng Xu, and Mimi Shi "Research progress on forage crop growth monitoring by remote sensing", Proc. SPIE 13513, The International Conference Optoelectronic Information and Optical Engineering (OIOE2024), 135131G (15 January 2025); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045534
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Remote sensing

Crop monitoring

Vegetation

Environmental monitoring

Reflection

Data modeling

Satellites

Back to Top