Paper
17 May 2001 Accuracy and relevancy of probit analysis for in vivo dose-response laser tissue experiments
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The most common method of analysis for 'sin vivo laser tissue experiments" is the probit regression. The data gathered at these experiments are specific in that there are very few repetitions of the exact stimulus exposure; thus the response frequencies for most stimulus are either '0' or '1'. Though such type of data is acceptable in probit, it seems that such data might not produce robust estimates of the ED50 and the slope. The accuracy of the probit's estimation was investigated by the use of Monte-Carlo simulation. Preliminary results suggest that the accuracy of the probifs estimations is conditional and might be biased in a way that raise doubts about the validity ofthe conclusions based on probit's estimations.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Amir Langus, Camil Fuchs, and Israel Gannot "Accuracy and relevancy of probit analysis for in vivo dose-response laser tissue experiments", Proc. SPIE 4246, Laser and Noncoherent Light Ocular Effects: Epidemiology, Prevention, and Treatment, (17 May 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.426712
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Error analysis

Statistical analysis

Tolerancing

Laser tissue interaction

Analytical research

In vivo imaging

Monte Carlo methods

Back to Top