Influence of panel size and expert skill on truth panel performance when combining expert ratings

Nicholas Petrick; Brandon D. Gallas; Frank W. Samuelson; Robert F. Wagner; Kyle J. Myers

doi:10.1117/12.596286

6 April 2005 Influence of panel size and expert skill on truth panel performance when combining expert ratings

Nicholas Petrick, Brandon D. Gallas, Frank W. Samuelson, Robert F. Wagner, Kyle J. Myers

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 5749, Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.596286
Event: Medical Imaging, 2005, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

The focus of this manuscript is to investigate the statistical properties of expert panels used as a substitute for clinical truth through a simplistic Monte Carlo simulation model. We use Gaussian models to simulate both normal and abnormal distributions of ideal-observer test statistics. These distributions are designed to produce an ideal observer area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.85. Expert observers are modeled as an ideal observer test statistic degraded by a zero-mean Gaussian random variable. Different expert skill levels are achieved by changing the added variance. The experts' skill ranges between 0.6 and 0.8 in AUC. We combine decisions from 2-10 experts into a panel score by taking the median of all expert ratings as the panel test statistic. In experiment 1, truth panels made up of 2, 4, 8 and 10 experts who had the same skill level (AUC=0.8) achieved mean AUCs of 0.82, 0.83, 0.84, and 0.84, respectively. For experiment 2, the experts' skill level was varied uniformly between 0.6 and 0.8 in AUC. Panel performance decreased in experiment 2 compared to the fixed skill level panels in experiment 1. However, panels composed of 8 and 10 experts still achieved an AUC greater than 0.80, the maximum of any individual expert. These simulation experiments, while idealized and simplistic, are a starting point for understanding the implications of using a panel of experts as surrogate truth in ROC studies when a gold standard is not available.

Citation Download Citation

Nicholas Petrick, Brandon D. Gallas, Frank W. Samuelson, Robert F. Wagner, and Kyle J. Myers "Influence of panel size and expert skill on truth panel performance when combining expert ratings", Proc. SPIE 5749, Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (6 April 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.596286

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE