The use of diffractive imitator optics as calibration artefacts

Paul C. T. Rees; John B. Mitchell; Andy Volkov; Jean-Michel Asfour; Frank Weidner; Alexander G. Poleshchuk; Ruslan K. Nasyrov

doi:10.1117/12.2189809

27 August 2015 The use of diffractive imitator optics as calibration artefacts

Paul C. T. Rees, John B. Mitchell, Andy Volkov, Jean-Michel Asfour, Frank Weidner, Alexander G. Poleshchuk, Ruslan K. Nasyrov

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9575, Optical Manufacturing and Testing XI; 957516 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2189809
Event: SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, 2015, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

The testing of highly aspheric optics often requires complex test arrangements: these test systems can be multi-element and will have both fabrication and alignment errors present in the test wavefront. It may not be feasible to calibrate such systems with conventional optical shop practice. The use of diffractive imitator optics, with carefully controlled fabrication uncertainties, can be used to characterise these systems. We describe the use of reflective imitator CGH optics as calibration artefacts in the calibration of an optical test system used to test ELT primary mirror segments. The optical test system is designed to have two operational modes: one to measure a spherical reference optic; and one to measure the primary mirror segment. The use of diffractive imitators in this test system is designed to provide traceability between these two operational configurations, to quantify residual alignment aberrations, and to quantify fabrication errors in the test system. We outline the design of the optical test system, the design of three imitator CGH artefacts required to provide traceability between the two optical test modes, and our calibration approach. We demonstrate the calibration performance achieved with this approach. Without the use of these imitator artefacts, the absolute accuracy of the optical test is estimated to be 149 nm RMS wavefront, of which 47 nm RMS is attributed to midspatial wavefront errors and 141 nm RMS is attributed to alignment and prescription errors. The repeatability of this calibration has been established as better than 3 nm wavefront standard deviation, with an absolute accuracy of 19 nm RMS wavefront.

Citation Download Citation

Paul C. T. Rees, John B. Mitchell, Andy Volkov, Jean-Michel Asfour, Frank Weidner, Alexander G. Poleshchuk, and Ruslan K. Nasyrov "The use of diffractive imitator optics as calibration artefacts", Proc. SPIE 9575, Optical Manufacturing and Testing XI, 957516 (27 August 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2189809

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
12 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Optical testing

Calibration

Wavefronts

Computer generated holography

Optical fabrication

Optics manufacturing

Optical alignment

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years