Open Access
29 June 2022 Deterministic generation of large-scale hyperentanglement in three degrees of freedom
Xutong Wang, Sheng Yu, Shengshuai Liu, Kai Zhang, Yanbo Lou, Wei Wang, Jietai Jing
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Entanglement serves as a fundamental resource for quantum information protocols, and hyperentanglement has received an increasing amount of attention for its high-capacity characteristic. Increasing the scale of hyperentanglement, i.e., the number of modes in a hyperentangled system, is crucial for enhancing its capability in quantum information processing. Here, we demonstrate the generation of large-scale continuous-variable (CV) hyperentanglement in three degrees of freedom (DOFs), including azimuthal and radial indices of Laguerre–Gaussian (LG) modes and frequency. In our experiment, 216 pairs of hyperentangled modes are deterministically generated from the four-wave mixing process in an atomic vapor. In addition, we show that the entanglement between coherent LG superposition modes denoted by both azimuthal and radial quantum numbers can also be generated from this system. Such large-scale CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs presents an efficient scheme to significantly increase the information capacity of the CV system. Our results provide a new platform for studying CV quantum information and open the avenue for constructing high-capacity parallel and multiple-DOF CV quantum information protocols.

1.

Introduction

Quantum entanglement, a form of strong correlation in quantum systems, is at the heart of quantum information science and technology.1 Hyperentanglement, the simultaneous entanglement in more than one degree of freedom (DOF),2,3 has attracted widespread attention and is a promising resource for implementing high-capacity quantum information protocols. There are two main branches of quantum information systems, namely, discrete variable (DV)4 and continuous variable (CV)5 systems. The current trend is to combine them together to give full play to their respective advantages, establishing the so-called hybrid systems.68 This study focuses on the CV system, which has the advantage of deterministic generation of entanglement, as all the generated quantum states are fully taken into account without post-selection.5 Compared with the well-developed DV hyperentanglement,2,3,914 CV hyperentanglement15,16 remains relatively unexplored. The scale of the hyperentanglement, i.e., the number of modes in a hyperentangled system, determines its capability of quantum information processing. However, it remains a challenge for CV hyperentanglement to scale to a large number of modes. Multiplexing, the indispensable concept of modern optical communication, can largely improve the information-carrying capacity by integrating multiple channels into one.1720 Multiplexing has also been transplanted to CV systems by using different types of DOFs, including frequency,2123 time,2426 polarization,27,28 and spatial mode.29,30 By simultaneously multiplexing multiple DOFs, it is promising to develop large-scale CV hyperentanglement, which can enable the implementation of high-capacity parallel and multiple-DOF CV quantum information protocols.

Laguerre–Gaussian (LG) modes, the solution of the paraxial wave equation in cylindrical coordinates, are characterized by azimuthal index (an integer) and radial index p (a non-negative integer). These two quantum numbers provide two independent spatial DOFs. The azimuthal index , corresponding to the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of the optical field,31,32 has been widely employed in an ocean of physical processes.3344 Meanwhile, OAM finds applications in both DV4551 and CV5255 quantum systems due to the fact that it can form a high-dimensional Hilbert state space. In sharp contrast to the in-depth study of OAM, the radial index of the radial mode is often overlooked56 and has only attracted attention in the past few years.5760 Due to the self-healing properties of high-radial-index mode61 and its propagation stability in the graded-index fiber,62 radial modes can find applications in practical long-distance communications for both free-space and fiber channels. More importantly, the radial index provides another high-dimensional Hilbert state space for greatly boosting the information capacity of quantum systems in addition to OAM. For example, high-dimensional DV entanglement63,64 and high-dimensional DV quantum gates65 have been demonstrated by considering both OAM and radial DOFs. However, such full consideration of the two quantum numbers or DOFs has not yet been demonstrated in the CV system. Combining such full consideration of OAM and radial DOFs with frequency DOF will enable the generation of large-scale CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs.

Here, we demonstrate the experimental generation of large-scale CV hyperentanglement in OAM, radial, and frequency DOFs. 216 pairs of hyperentangled modes defined by the discrete dimensions of these three DOFs are deterministically generated from the four-wave mixing (FWM) process in a hot Rb85 atomic vapor. To the best of our knowledge, hyperentanglement has never been scaled to such a large number of modes in the CV quantum system. Moreover, we show that entangled coherent LG superposition modes with consideration of both azimuthal and radial quantum numbers can also be generated from this system. Such large-scale CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs largely enhances the data-carrying capacity of the CV system.

2.

Principles and Methods

The FWM process is based on the double-Λ energy level configuration in the D1 line of Rb85. Pumped by a strong beam with a frequency of ωPump, this FWM process generates probe (conjugate) beams with a frequency of ωPumpf (ωPump+f), where f denotes the frequency shifting from the pump beam. Due to the OAM conservation and the phase-matching conditions of the FWM process, multitudinous pairs of LG,p,fPr and LG,p,fConj modes are generated simultaneously, where Pr and Conj indicate probe and conjugate beams, respectively. Labeling the creation operators of the probe mode and conjugate mode as a^,p,f and b^,p,f, respectively, and denoting the interaction strength as the real parameter γ,p,f, the interaction Hamiltonian of the FWM process can be written as

Eq. (1)

H^=,p,fiγ,p,fa^,p,fb^,p,f+H.c.,
where H.c. denotes the Hermitian conjugate. Then, the corresponding time-evolution operator U=eiH^t/ is applied to vacuum state. The output field state can be expressed as the product of a series of two-mode squeezed vacuum states, i.e.,

Eq. (2)

|ψout=,p,f|ψ,p,f,
where |ψ,p,f is a squeezed vacuum state, or CV entangled state, of two modes with the opposite azimuthal quantum number, the same radial quantum number, and the opposite frequency shifting from the pump beam. These orthogonal two-mode squeezed vacuum states are a series of CV entanglements in three independent DOFs, and each optical mode is defined by the discrete dimensions of all three DOFs. In other words, the generated optical modes are simultaneously entangled in OAM, radial, and frequency DOFs, guaranteeing the generation of large-scale CV hyperentanglement (see Sec. S2 in the Supplemental Material for the detailed theoretical model). These three DOFs are equally important in generating CV hyperentanglement.

In our system, the physical quantities of entanglement are amplitude and phase quadratures, which have a continuous spectrum, of the optical modes. Such CV entanglement manifests itself in strong correlation between the quantum fluctuations of quadratures of a pair of optical modes. For the purpose of verifying the existence of CV entanglement, the positivity under partial transposition criterion66 is used. One can determine if a state is entangled by constructing the covariance matrix σ from quadratures and calculating the smallest symplectic eigenvalue ν of the partially transposed covariance matrix. An entangled state is verified if ν is smaller than 1. Otherwise, the state is separable.

The detailed experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1(a), where seeded and unseeded FWM processes happen in the same Rb85 vapor cell. The unseeded one is for generating large-scale CV hyperentanglement, and the seeded one is for generating local oscillators (LOs) of the balanced homodyne detections (BHDs). A cavity stabilized Ti:sapphire laser produces a beam whose frequency is around 377.1102 THz (ωPump). The beam is divided into two, one of which is further split, serving as respective pump beams of the two FWM processes. The other beam is redshifted by f through an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) and then transformed into the desired spatial modes by a spatial light modulator (SLM), serving as probe beam of the seeded FWM process. Strong pump beams with a radius of 475μm are focused at the center of the aforementioned Rb85 vapor cell whose temperature is stabilized at 118°C, and the probe and conjugate beams are symmetrically crossed with the pump beam at about 7 mrad. To measure the covariance matrix elements and verify the hyperentanglement from the unseeded FWM process, two BHDs are employed: one for detecting the probe beam and the other one for detecting conjugate beam. It is noteworthy that the generated fields will be projected onto the LG,p,f mode if the LO carries the LG,p,f mode, which ensures the perfect extraction of the desired mode (see Sec. S3 in the Supplemental Material). In the experiment, extraction efficiency depends on the visibility of the BHD. The photocurrent from each BHD gives the variance of the single-beam quadrature, while the two BHDs together with their photocurrent subtraction and addition give the covariance of the two-beam quadratures. Then, these photocurrents are recorded by two spectrum analyzers (SAs), which are set to 300-kHz resolution bandwidth, 300-Hz video bandwidth, zero span, and 1.5-MHz center frequency. In this way, all the elements of the covariance matrix can be obtained.

Fig. 1

Experimental setup for generation and verification of large-scale CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs. (a) Two similar FWM processes happen in a Rb85 vapor cell, one of which is seeded with a probe beam modulated by an AOM and an SLM. The seeded FWM process generates the LOs of the two BHDs for extracting the desired modes generated from the unseeded FWM process. Two scanned PZTs are used to change the phases of the two BHDs for measuring the desired field quadrature. The photocurrents of the two BHDs are recorded by two SAs. AOM: acousto-optic modulator; BHD1 and BHD2: balanced homodyne detections; BS1 and BS2: 50:50 beam splitters; LO: local oscillator; PZT1 and PZT2: piezoelectric actuators; Rb cell: hot Rb85 vapor cell; SA1 and SA2: spectrum analyzers; SLM: spatial light modulator. (b) The energy level diagram of the double-Λ configuration in the D1 line of Rb85. Δ: one-photon detuning; δ: two-photon detuning; f: frequency shifting from pump beam.

APN_1_1_016002_f001.png

3.

Results

For demonstrating CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs, we perform measurements with varying , p, and f by changing the hologram displayed on the SLM and the input radio-frequency signal of the AOM. The images of the FWM output field for different modes are captured by a charge-coupled device (CCD) and shown in the upper panel of each subfigure of Fig. 2, where each subfigure stands for different frequency modes with f=3.04  GHz [Fig. 2(a)], f=3.045  GHz [Fig. 2(b)], and f=3.05  GHz [Fig. 2(c)], as indicated by the lower panel. The intensity profiles from top to bottom in each image are the amplified probe beam, pump beam, and newly generated conjugate beam, respectively. It can be seen that the higher the LG mode order is, the bigger the beam size will be. Such increment in beam size results in the reduced overlap with the pump beam and thus weaker nonlinear interaction strength, leading to smaller intensity gain. The smallest symplectic eigenvalues ν of the partially transposed covariance matrices for the different modes are shown in the middle panel of each subfigure of Fig. 2. As can be seen, with the LG mode order getting higher, the value of ν increases due to the decreasing of nonlinear interaction strength, indicating the weakening of the entanglement degree. For high-order LG modes, ν being not smaller than 1 indicates the vanishment of the CV entanglement. It can also be found that the larger the value of radial index p is, the narrower the azimuthal index range of the OAM modes possessing entanglement will be. For example, as shown in Fig. 2(a), when f=3.04  GHz, for radial index p=4, only the OAM modes with azimuthal index from 3 to 3 possess entanglement, while for radial index p=0, the range of azimuthal index of OAM modes possessing entanglement is from 11 to 11. The mutual restriction of these two quantum numbers in terms of entanglement generation is due to the fact that the increase of either one of these two quantum numbers can lead to an increase in beam size. In addition, the symplectic eigenvalue ν for OAM entanglement in the case of radial index p=0 is smaller than the corresponding value with a nonzero radial index, which shows that the quality of hyperentanglement in OAM and radial DOFs is less than the quality of entanglement in OAM DOF. Nevertheless, under our experimental condition, for maintaining entanglement, the maximal range of is from 11 to 11, while the maximal range of p is from 0 to 5. Figure 2(a) gives the results of hyperentanglement in OAM and radial DOFs with the generation of 78 pairs of LG modes when f=3.04  GHz. To realize CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs, we utilize the frequency mode by changing the amount of frequency shifting f and repeating the above measurements. Similar results for f=3.045  GHz and f=3.05  GHz are shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c), respectively. Altogether, 216 pairs of hyperentangled modes in OAM, radial, and frequency DOFs are deterministically generated. For a fixed frequency, the possible number of pairs of entangled spatial modes possibly created by this system in the ideal case is estimated to be around 297 according to the Schmidt number,6769 which is roughly the number of mode pairs coupled in the gain region (see Sec. S8 in the Supplemental Material). However, various experimental imperfections are unavoidable, such as atomic absorption, propagation losses, imperfect homodyne visibilities, non-unity quantum efficiency of photodiodes, and scattered pump light, which introduce excess noise and deteriorate the entanglement. Therefore, the number of experimentally accessible entangled spatial mode pairs is lower than the theoretically predicted Schmidt number. Taking into account experimental parameters and these aforementioned experimental imperfections, the theoretical predictions of the smallest symplectic eigenvalue ν agree well with the corresponding experimental results, and the fidelities between the theoretically predicted and experimentally generated hyperentangled states are all above 0.9 (see Sec. S8 in the Supplemental Material).

Fig. 2

Experimental results for verifying large-scale CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs. 91 pairs of LG modes are measured at different frequencies with (a) f=3.04  GHz, (b) f=3.045  GHz, and (c) f=3.05  GHz. The upper panel of each subfigure shows the CCD captured images of LG modes generated from the FWM process with varying quantum numbers of azimuthal index and radial index p. Labeled columns represent the azimuthal index of the probe beam, while labeled rows represent the radial index p of the probe beam. The entangled LG modes are enclosed inside the orange frame. The middle panel of each subfigure shows the smallest symplectic eigenvalue ν of the partially transposed covariance matrix as a function of the two quantum numbers and p, respectively. The lower panel of each subfigure indicates the frequency of hyperentangled LG modes.

APN_1_1_016002_f002.png

Going a step further, it is interesting to investigate the entanglement properties of coherent LG superposition modes by considering both quantum numbers and p, which shows the potential advantage of our system for demonstrating parallel quantum information processing. Here, we fix f at 3.04 GHz. First, the LOs are tailored by seeding the LG1,3+LG2,1 mode into the FWM process [see Fig. 3(a) for the theoretical intensity profile and phase pattern and Fig. 3(b) for the experimentally observed intensity profile], and the covariance matrix of LG1,3Pr+LG2,1Pr and LG1,3Conj+LG2,1Conj modes can be measured. The smallest symplectic eigenvalue ν is calculated to be 0.691±0.013, indicating the existence of entanglement between these two LG superposition modes. Secondly, we turn to study another type of coherent LG superposition mode LG,p±LG,p. The intensity profile of this sort of mode is constituted of p+1 radial circles and 2 angularly symmetric petals in each radial circle, as shown in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), making it useful for free-space communication under turbulent conditions.70 Specifically, we investigate the entanglement between LG,2Pr+LG,2Pr [LG,2PrLG,2Pr] and LG,2Conj+LG,2Conj [LG,2ConjLG,2Conj] modes with from 1 to 8, and the corresponding FWM output images and smallest symplectic eigenvalues ν are shown in Fig. 3(e) [Fig. 3(f)] and Fig. 3(g) [Fig. 3(h)], respectively. With the increase of azimuthal index , the beam size gets bigger, resulting in weaker nonlinear interaction strength. As a consequence, the intensity gain decreases, and ν increases. For in the range from 1 to 7, these coherent LG superposition modes remain entangled. These experimental results are consistent with the ones in Fig. 2 and clearly verify the entanglement between coherent LG superposition modes with both azimuthal and radial quantum numbers involved.

Fig. 3

Experimental results for verifying CV entanglement between coherent LG superposition modes considering both azimuthal and radial quantum numbers in the case of f=3.04  GHz. (a) The theoretical intensity profile (top row) and phase pattern (bottom row) of the LG1,3+LG2,1 mode. (b) The CCD captured image of the entangled LG1,3Pr+LG2,1Pr mode and LG1,3Conj+LG2,1Conj mode. (c) The theoretical intensity profile and phase pattern of the LG3,2+LG3,2 mode. (d) The theoretical intensity profile and phase pattern of the LG3,2LG3,2 mode. (e) The CCD captured images of the LG,2Pr+LG,2Pr mode and the LG,2Conj+LG,2Conj mode for varying from 1 to 8. The entangled modes are enclosed inside the orange frame. (f) The CCD captured images of the LG,2PrLG,2Pr mode and the LG,2ConjLG,2Conj mode for varying from 1 to 8. (g) The measured smallest symplectic eigenvalue ν as a function of for LG,2Pr+LG,2Pr and LG,2Conj+LG,2Conj modes. (h) The measured smallest symplectic eigenvalue ν as a function of for LG,2PrLG,2Pr and LG,2ConjLG,2Conj modes.

APN_1_1_016002_f003.png

4.

Conclusions and Discussion

We have experimentally implemented large-scale CV hyperentanglement in three DOFs. The 216 pairs of hyperentangled modes in OAM (), radial (p), and frequency (f) DOFs are generated from the FWM process in a single hot Rb85 vapor cell. In addition, we demonstrate the entanglement of coherent LG superposition modes denoted by both azimuthal and radial quantum numbers. Such large-scale CV hyperentanglement greatly enhances the information-carrying capacity of the CV system. Several beneficial improvements can be adopted to further enlarge the number of entangled mode pairs, such as decreasing the cell length,67 increasing the pump beam size,54 tailoring the pump beam profile,71 and exploiting more DOFs. Although we have only chosen three frequency sidebands to realize multiplexing, the actual frequency bandwidth for maintaining entanglement is at the level of tens of MHz (see Sec. S5 in the Supplemental Material), which is determined by the atomic system itself. To substantially improve the frequency bandwidth for maintaining entanglement, one possibility is to replace the atomic medium with nonlinear crystal such as a PPLN waveguide.72

Utilizing the LG mode sorter73,74 and frequency filter cavity,75 these hyperentangled modes can be efficiently spatially separated (see Sec. S9 in the Supplemental Material), making our scheme particularly useful for constructing high-capacity parallel and multiple-DOF quantum communication protocols. In parallel quantum communication,75,76 multiple quantum communication channels can be constructed without the crosstalk from each other, and various quantum information tasks7779 can be performed simultaneously, which significantly enhances the information capacity and diversity of quantum communication systems. In addition, a complex quantum system cannot be fully described by a single DOF, and a critical issue that must be addressed is how to teleport more than one DOF simultaneously. In this respect, quantum teleportation of multiple DOFs of a single photon has been demonstrated in the DV system using hyperentanglement in both spin angular momentum and OAM.80 Such multiple-DOF quantum teleportation in CV systems, the realization of which requires the generation of CV hyperentanglement, has never been reported. Our large-scale CV hyperentanglement provides the possibility to realize such multiple-DOF quantum teleportation in CV systems, even more generally, multiple-DOF quantum communication protocols.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge useful discussions with Xiaozhou Pan and Lixiang Chen. This work was funded by the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. 2021-01-07-00-08-E00100); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11874155, 91436211, 11374104, and 12174110); the Basic Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. 20JC1416100); the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (17ZR1442900); the Minhang Leading Talents (Grant No. 201971); the Program of Scientific and Technological Innovation of Shanghai (Grant No. 17JC1400401); the Shanghai Sailing Program (Grant No. 21YF1410800); the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0302103); the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2019SHZDZX01); and the 111 Project (Grant No. B12024). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data, Materials, and Code Availability

The data that support the results within this paper and other findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. 

R. Horodecki et al., “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 81 (2), 865 –942 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 RMPHAT 0034-6861 Google Scholar

2. 

P. G. Kwiat, “Hyper-entangled states,” J. Mod. Opt., 44 (11–12), 2173 –2184 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349708231877 JMOPEW 0950-0340 Google Scholar

3. 

J. T. Barreiro et al., “Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 95 (26), 260501 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260501 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

4. 

J.-W. Pan et al., “Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 84 (2), 777 –838 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.777 RMPHAT 0034-6861 Google Scholar

5. 

S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 77 (2), 513 –577 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513 RMPHAT 0034-6861 Google Scholar

6. 

S. Takeda et al., “Deterministic quantum teleportation of photonic quantum bits by a hybrid technique,” Nature, 500 (7462), 315 –318 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12366 Google Scholar

7. 

O. Morin et al., “Remote creation of hybrid entanglement between particle-like and wave-like optical qubits,” Nat. Photonics, 8 (7), 570 –574 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.137 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

8. 

U. L. Andersen et al., “Hybrid discrete- and continuous-variable quantum information,” Nat. Phys., 11 (9), 713 –719 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3410 NPAHAX 1745-2473 Google Scholar

9. 

W.-B. Gao et al., “Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state,” Nat. Phys., 6 (5), 331 –335 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1603 NPAHAX 1745-2473 Google Scholar

10. 

Z. Xie et al., “Harnessing high-dimensional hyperentanglement through a biphoton frequency comb,” Nat. Photonics, 9 (8), 536 –542 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.110 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

11. 

M. A. Ciampini et al., “Path-polarization hyperentangled and cluster states of photons on a chip,” Light Sci. Appl., 5 (4), e16064 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.64 Google Scholar

12. 

X.-L. Wang et al., “18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 (26), 260502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.260502 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

13. 

T.-M. Zhao, Y. S. Ihn and Y.-H. Kim, “Direct generation of narrow-band hyperentangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 122 (12), 123607 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.123607 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

14. 

C. Reimer et al., “High-dimensional one-way quantum processing implemented on d-level cluster states,” Nat. Phys., 15 (2), 148 –153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0347-x NPAHAX 1745-2473 Google Scholar

15. 

B. C. dos Santos, K. Dechoum and A. Z. Khoury, “Continuous-variable hyperentanglement in a parametric oscillator with orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 103 (23), 230503 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.230503 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

16. 

K. Liu et al., “Experimental generation of continuous-variable hyperentanglement in an optical parametric oscillator,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 113 (17), 170501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.170501 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

17. 

J. Wang et al., “Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing,” Nat. Photonics, 6 (7), 488 –496 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

18. 

N. Bozinovic et al., “terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers,” Science, 340 (6140), 1545 –1548 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237861 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

19. 

T. Lei et al., “Massive individual orbital angular momentum channels for multiplexing enabled by Dammann gratings,” Light Sci. Appl., 4 (3), e257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2015.30 Google Scholar

20. 

Y. Wen et al., “Compact and high-performance vortex mode sorter for multi-dimensional multiplexed fiber communication systems,” Optica, 7 (3), 254 –262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.385590 Google Scholar

21. 

M. Pysher et al., “Parallel generation of quadripartite cluster entanglement in the optical frequency comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (3), 030505 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.030505 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

22. 

M. Chen, N. C. Menicucci and O. Pfister, “Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 112 (12), 120505 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120505 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

23. 

J. Roslund et al., “Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics, 8 (2), 109 –112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.340 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

24. 

S. Yokoyama et al., “Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (12), 982 –986 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.287 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

25. 

M. V. Larsen et al., “Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state,” Science, 366 (6463), 369 –372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4354 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

26. 

W. Asavanant et al., “Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state,” Science, 366 (6463), 373 –376 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay2645 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

27. 

P. Jouguet et al., “Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution,” Nat. Photonics, 7 (5), 378 –381 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.63 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

28. 

B. Heim et al., “Atmospheric continuous-variable quantum communication,” New J. Phys., 16 (11), 113018 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113018 NJOPFM 1367-2630 Google Scholar

29. 

J. Sun et al., “Spatial multiplexing of squeezed light by coherence diffusion,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 123 (20), 203604 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.203604 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

30. 

K. Zhang et al., “Reconfigurable hexapartite entanglement by spatially multiplexed four-wave mixing processes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 124 (9), 090501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.090501 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

31. 

L. Allen et al., “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre–Gaussian laser modes,” Phys. Rev. A, 45 (11), 8185 –8189 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 Google Scholar

32. 

A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, “Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,” Adv. Opt. Photonics, 3 (2), 161 –204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.3.000161 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

33. 

M. P. J. Lavery et al., “Detection of a spinning object using light’s orbital angular momentum,” Science, 341 (6145), 537 –540 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239936 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

34. 

V. D’Ambrosio et al., “Photonic polarization gears for ultra-sensitive angular measurements,” Nat. Commun., 4 (1), 2432 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3432 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

35. 

H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop et al., “Roadmap on structured light,” J. Opt., 19 (1), 013001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/19/1/013001 Google Scholar

36. 

Y. Shen et al., “Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities,” Light Sci. Appl., 8 (1), 90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 Google Scholar

37. 

L. Du et al., “Deep-subwavelength features of photonic skyrmions in a confined electromagnetic field with orbital angular momentum,” Nat. Phys., 15 (7), 650 –654 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7 NPAHAX 1745-2473 Google Scholar

38. 

I. Gianani et al., “Transmission of vector vortex beams in dispersive media,” Adv. Photonics, 2 (3), 036003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.2.3.036003 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

39. 

Y. Chen et al., “Phase-matching controlled orbital angular momentum conversion in periodically poled crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 (14), 143901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.143901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

40. 

Y. Wen et al., “Arbitrary multiplication and division of the orbital angular momentum of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 124 (21), 213901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.213901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

41. 

D. Mao et al., “Generation of polarization and phase singular beams in fibers and fiber lasers,” Adv. Photonics, 3 (1), 014002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.1.014002 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

42. 

X. Fang et al., “High-dimensional orbital angular momentum multiplexing nonlinear holography,” Adv. Photonics, 3 (1), 015001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.1.015001 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

43. 

A. Forbes, M. de Oliveira and M. R. Dennis, “Structured light,” Nat. Photonics, 15 (4), 253 –262 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-021-00780-4 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

44. 

Y. Yang et al., “Optical trapping with structured light: a review,” Adv. Photonics, 3 (3), 034001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.3.034001 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

45. 

A. Mair et al., “Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons,” Nature, 412 (6844), 313 –316 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35085529 Google Scholar

46. 

G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nat. Phys., 3 (5), 305 –310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys607 NPAHAX 1745-2473 Google Scholar

47. 

A. C. Dada et al., “Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities,” Nat. Phys., 7 (9), 677 –680 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1996 NPAHAX 1745-2473 Google Scholar

48. 

R. Fickler et al., “Quantum entanglement of high angular momenta,” Science, 338 (6107), 640 –643 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227193 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

49. 

F. Cardano et al., “Quantum walks and wavepacket dynamics on a lattice with twisted photons,” Sci. Adv., 1 (2), e1500087 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500087 STAMCV 1468-6996 Google Scholar

50. 

M. Erhard et al., “Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions,” Light Sci. Appl., 7 (3), 17146 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2017.146 Google Scholar

51. 

D. Cozzolino et al., “Air-core fiber distribution of hybrid vector vortex-polarization entangled states,” Adv. Photonics, 1 (4), 046005 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.1.4.046005 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

52. 

A. M. Marino et al., “Delocalized correlations in twin light beams with orbital angular momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 101 (9), 093602 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.093602 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

53. 

M. Lassen, G. Leuchs and U. L. Andersen, “Continuous variable entanglement and squeezing of orbital angular momentum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 102 (16), 163602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.163602 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

54. 

X. Pan et al., “Orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed continuous-variable entanglement from four-wave mixing in hot atomic vapor,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 123 (7), 070506 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.070506 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

55. 

S. Li, X. Pan and Y. Ren, “Deterministic generation of orbital-angular-momentum multiplexed tripartite entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 124 (8), 083605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.083605 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

56. 

W. N. Plick et al., “The forgotten quantum number: a short note on the radial modes of Laguerre–Gauss beams,” (2013). Google Scholar

57. 

E. Karimi et al., “Exploring the quantum nature of the radial degree of freedom of a photon via Hong-Ou-Mandel interference,” Phys. Rev. A, 89 (1), 013829 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.013829 Google Scholar

58. 

Y. Zhou et al., “Sorting photons by radial quantum number,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 119 (26), 263602 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.263602 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

59. 

X. Gu et al., “Gouy phase radial mode sorter for light: concepts and experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 (10), 103601 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.103601 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

60. 

L. Chen et al., “Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using radial position and radial momentum variables,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 123 (6), 060403 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.060403 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

61. 

J. Mendoza-Hernández et al., “Laguerre–Gauss beams versus Bessel beams showdown: peer comparison,” Opt. Lett., 40 (16), 3739 –3742 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.003739 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

62. 

W. N. Plick and M. Krenn, “Physical meaning of the radial index of Laguerre–Gauss beams,” Phys. Rev. A, 92 (6), 063841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.063841 Google Scholar

63. 

V. D. Salakhutdinov, E. R. Eliel and W. Löffler, “Full-field quantum correlations of spatially entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (17), 173604 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.173604 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

64. 

M. Krenn et al., “Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111 (17), 6243 –6247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402365111 Google Scholar

65. 

F. Brandt et al., “High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons,” Optica, 7 (2), 98 –107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.375875 Google Scholar

66. 

R. Simon, “Peres-Horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (12), 2726 –2729 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

67. 

C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, “Analysis and interpretation of high transverse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (12), 127903 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127903 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

68. 

V. Boyer et al., “Entangled images from four-wave mixing,” Science, 321 (5888), 544 –547 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158275 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

69. 

C. S. Embrey et al., “Observation of localized multi-spatial-mode quadrature squeezing,” Phys. Rev. X, 5 (3), 031004 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031004 PRXHAE 2160-3308 Google Scholar

70. 

M. Krenn et al., “Communication with spatially modulated light through turbulent air across Vienna,” New J. Phys., 16 (11), 113028 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113028 NJOPFM 1367-2630 Google Scholar

71. 

S. Liu et al., “Increasing two-photon entangled dimensions by shaping input-beam profiles,” Phys. Rev. A, 101 (5), 052324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.052324 Google Scholar

72. 

T. Kashiwazaki et al., “Continuous-wave 6-dB-squeezed light with 2.5-THz-bandwidth from single-mode PPLN waveguide,” APL Photonics, 5 (3), 036104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142437 Google Scholar

73. 

N. K. Fontaine et al., “Laguerre–Gaussian mode sorter,” Nat. Commun., 10 (1), 1865 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09840-4 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

74. 

R. Fickler et al., “Full-field mode sorter using two optimized phase transformations for high-dimensional quantum cryptography,” J. Opt., 22 (2), 024001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ab6303 Google Scholar

75. 

S. Shi et al., “Demonstration of channel multiplexing quantum communication exploiting entangled sideband modes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 125 (7), 070502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.070502 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

76. 

S. Liu, Y. Lou and J. Jing, “Orbital angular momentum multiplexed deterministic all-optical quantum teleportation,” Nat. Commun., 11 (1), 3875 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17616-4 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

77. 

J. Jing et al., “Experimental demonstration of tripartite entanglement and controlled dense coding for continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 90 (16), 167903 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.167903 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

78. 

S. Pirandola et al., “Advances in quantum teleportation,” Nat. Photonics, 9 (10), 641 –652 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

79. 

Y. Zhou et al., “Quantum secret sharing among four players using multipartite bound entanglement of an optical field,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 (15), 150502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.150502 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

80. 

X.-L. Wang et al., “Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon,” Nature, 518 (7540), 516 –519 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14246 Google Scholar

81. 

L. Banchi, S. L. Braunstein and S. Pirandola, “Quantum fidelity for arbitrary Gaussian states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 115 (26), 260501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.260501 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Xutong Wang, Sheng Yu, Shengshuai Liu, Kai Zhang, Yanbo Lou, Wei Wang, and Jietai Jing "Deterministic generation of large-scale hyperentanglement in three degrees of freedom," Advanced Photonics Nexus 1(1), 016002 (29 June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.APN.1.1.016002
Received: 16 May 2022; Accepted: 20 May 2022; Published: 29 June 2022
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 5 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Quantum information

Superposition

Laser beam diagnostics

Rubidium

Bragg cells

Charge-coupled devices

Quantum communications

Back to Top