|
1.IntroductionGliomas are a group of multiform, accumulative tumors that appear in the neuroectoderm. They generally induce perifocal edema and a massive increase of intracranial pressure for their compression, infiltration, and destruction on brain tissues. The C6 rat intracerebral glioma model is prevalent in glioma research for its good growth yields and low mortality rate. Perifocal inflamed symptoms and neonatal blood vessels occur at postoperative day (POD) 5. On POD 10, tumors increase highly in size with cellular exponential growth. During days 15–20, tumors reveal malignant gliomas with intratumoral hemorrhage and necrosis.1, 2, 3, 4 Presently, near infrared spectroscopy is used widely in the differentiation tissue types.5, 6 It is known that near-infrared (NIR) light in the wavelength range is special to tissues as light scattering is more prominent than light absorption. There is a significant difference in light-scattering properties between different tissue types and between healthy and diseased tissues due to their differences in anatomical substructure; cellular and intracellular organelles of diseased tissues undergo changes in their density, morphological size, and shape.6, 7, 8, 9 In this study, an effort was made to develop NIR technology as an alternate method for detection of certain characteristics of glioma. The aim of this study is to determine the light-scattering patterns from rat cerebral glioma by using NIR reflectance spectroscopy. The C6 gliomas were induced in Sprague-Dawley rats (SD) by the stereotactic implantation technique.10 It has been reported that tumors generally have a lower scattering coefficient measured in vitro than normal tissue.7, 9 Therefore, for this study, our hypothesis is that gliomas will lead to a decrease in light scattering of the brain and can be differentiated by the in vivo NIR measurement. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Cell CultivationThe C6 glioma cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), L-glutamine, streptomycin, and penicillin. Cells were maintained in an incubator with , 100% humidity at . Before implantation to the rat brain, cells growing in an exponential rate were harvested by Trypsin for at . Trypsin was inactivated by medium with 10% FCS, and the cells centrifuged at for . The pellets were then resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium without any supplement, at a concentration of . Gentle manual agitation was applied to keep the cells in suspension before implantation. 2.2.Implantation SurgeryThirty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats ( , Southeast University vivarium) were used in this study. The animals were kept in their habitual environment untill the day of the experiment. All animals were anesthetized with 4% Nembutal ( , i.p.) and mounted into a stereotactic frame (incisor bar below the interaural line) in a flat-skull position. After the periosteum was unmasked, two burr holes were performed with a dental drill in the calvaria, respectively, on the left and right sides, lateral from the midline, posterior to the bregma. Suspension with C6 glioma cells were stereotactically injected at a depth of , by a microamount syringe (the syringe was pricked depth, and then was drawn back) on the right side. The same volumes of sodium chloride were injected at the same depth on the left side. The holes were sealed with bone wax, and the operative field washed with saline solution and the skin sutured. The body temperature was maintained at using a homeothermic heating pad throughout the experiment. All the experimental procedures follow the institutional guidelines and were approved by the Southeast University, China. 2.3.NIRs and ExperimentsNIR spectroscopy (NIRS) experiments were performed on POD 3, 10, and 17 with 10 rats each time. The homebuilt NIRs experimental system11 includes a light source (HL-2000, Ocean Optics, Inc., Dunedin, FL), a bifurcated needle probe ( o.d. with two single mode fibers of ), a spectrometer (USB 2000, Ocean Optics, Inc.), step motor and its driver system, a laptop, as shown in Fig. 1 . The bifurcated needle probe is composed of two branches. One branch is connected to the light source and the other to the spectrometer. The backscattered intensity of light depends strongly on the absorption and scattering properties of the tissue. The optic fiber probe was held perpendicularly above the exposed calvaria surface and mounted on a step motor, which was attached to a stereotaxic frame. This step motor drives the fiber probe deep into the brain at an interval of . For data acquisition, LabView (National Instruments, Austin, TX) was used to program the interface between the spectrometer and the computer. The integration time, which was taken by the detector to read out the intensity of backscattered light, was kept constant at during the entire set of measurements. The measurements were taken on the left and right brain. On each side, 40 steps in each brain side were measured, starting from the cortex with a spatial interval of . The data were recorded for a period of at at each step. 2.4.Calculating the Reduced Scattering CoefficientThe reduced scattering coefficient serves as an index for the light-scattering property of the tissue. In principle, the intensity of backscattered light highly depends on light-scattering features of the tissue. Johns 5 had found the slopes of reflectance spectra curves between 700 and could be used to differentiate cerebral gray matter and white matter. Qian 11 established a relationship among the reduced scattering coefficient, the profiles of the collected spectra from , and the wavelength. In this study, an empirical formula between the reduced scattering coefficient and the slope between 700 and was deduced by simulation experiment for the NIRs system before the rat experiments. An intralipid solution of 8, 6, 4, 2, and 1% concentrations were chosen in the simulation experiment because these solutions yield light-scattering properties similar to those found in human tissues. The reduced scattering coefficients of these tissue simulation solutions (intralipid) were acquired by a standard Oximeter (model no. 96208, ISS, Inc., Illinois) working at 690 and . At the same time, the reflectance spectra of these solutions were collected by the fiber-optic spectrometer of the NIRs system. Figure 2 shows the slopes and the relative reduced scattering coefficients. The relationship between the slopes and the reduced scattering coefficients is obtained by the data fitting. Thus, an empirical formula for calculating the reduced scattering coefficient is derived as The reduced scattering coefficients of intralipid solution measured by the Oximeter and calculated by Eqs. 1, 2 and their differences are showed in Table 1 , where the difference is equal to values calculated by the equations minus values measured by the Oximeter.Table 1The reduced scattering coefficients of intralipid solution measured by Oximeter and calculated by Eqs. 1, 2 and their differences.
The accuracy of Eqs. 1, 2 were further validated through the solid-tissue phantom experiment. Fifteen grams of Gelatin powder (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) made from porcine skin were added into of boiling water and was dissolved completely by stirring. After the solution was cooled down, the intralipid solution with a certain concentration was added to the prepared gelatin solution. After that, the solution was frozen for the formation of the gelatin phantom. The percentage concentration of the intralipid used was varied, depending on the required . Five solutions with intralipid concentrations of 1–4% were used to create different values for gelatin phantoms, whose and measured by the Oximeter and calculated by Eqs. 1, 2 and their differences are shown in Table 2 . Table 2The reduced scattering coefficients of gelatin phantoms measured by Oximeter and calculated by Eqs. 1, 2 and their differences.
It shows in Tables 1, 2 that the maximum difference is and mean difference at is bigger than at . The maximum difference at is . By combining the specific fiber-optic spectrometer with the empirical equations, an efficient method for real-time determination of the tissue reduced scattering coefficient is established. 2.5.Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Histology StudiesMRI exams were performed at POD 10 and 17 on a 1.5-T MRI scanner (Philips Eclipse) using a human wrist coil after NIRs measurement. Gd-DTPA was applied intravenously at concentrations of , before the scan. During the MRI scan, the rats were positioned in a plastic holder and anesthetized by 4% Nembutal ( , i.p.). Standard multislice sagittal and cross images were obtained by a TSE sequence with , , , , slice , slice , , and seven slices. After MRI, the rats were sacrificed with an anesthetic overdose and their brains were removed after the experiments. The brains were fixed in 10% formalin for more than and embedded in paraffin; consecutive coronal sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. A semiquantitative assessment of pathology was carried out by the neuropathologist for each individual specimen. 2.6.Statistical AnalysisThe data reported here consist of only the reduced scattering coefficient at 690 and . Spectral information between 700 and for each sampling at each location in the brain was acquired. Data were collected 20 times at each measured point in a acquisition period and then averaged. The data finally used in this study were the data at each point. For each side of a rat brain, there were 40 values because the probe went deep into the brain at an interval of . The values were also averaged on 10 rats at each point of each side for POD 3, 10, and 17. Furthermore, all the 30 C6 glioma models were confirmed by the MRI and histology. 3.Results3.1.Spectra and Light ScatteringRepresentative traces for the right brain (glioma) measured by the NIRS are shown in Fig. 3 . They represent the different spectral value at different depths. The reduced scattering coefficients at 690 and were calculated by Eqs. (2.1) and (2.2) using these spectral slopes. Analysis of showed that there were significant differences between left (control) and right (glioma) sides of the brain tissue (Fig. 4 ) on POD 10 and 17. Data in Fig. 4 are the average data at each point . versus depth have the same trend as versus depth. It shows that of the right side within some range is lower than that of the left side at its corresponding position, and of POD 17 is lower than of POD 10 in the right side. On POD 10, there was significant difference between the left and right from a depth of . On POD 17, the difference between the left and right is from a depth . The values measured for the left (control) and right (glioma) brain side on POD 10 and 17 at depths of are listed in Table 3 as , respectively. Table 3The μs′ values for the left and right side on POD 10 and 17 at different deep within the brain (n=10) .
3.2.MRI ImagingIn images of T2-weighted spin-echo and gradient-echo with Gd-DTPA enhancement, there were ellipse high signals in the right hemisphere, and these high signals were inhomogeneous in some rats (Fig. 5 ). 3.3.HistologyThe histopathological alterations of C6 gliomas were shown in Fig. 5. On a semiquantitative grading scale, all specimens had been classed into II/III grade by a neuropathologist. Prominent mitotic activity was observed under microscope on POD 10 [Fig. 6a and 6b ], by which gliomas are classed into grade II. An amount of tumor cells necrosis and hemorrhage in the central region of tumors occurred on POD 17 [Fig. 6c and 6d], by which gliomas are classed into grade III. 4.DiscussionThe in vivo measurements yielded to be within the range 11–26 and , respectively, for 690 and light in rat normal brain tissue, which is in good agreement with other in vivo measurements of in mammalian brains.12, 13 The upper and lower limits of the ranges can be taken as values of white matter and gray matter, respectively, at 690 and , according to their depth distributions in rat brain. For glioma on POD 10, the mean and are (standard error ) and (standard error ), respectively. For glioma on POD 17, the mean and are (standard error ) and (standard error ), respectively. To our knowledge, in vivo measurements of of glioma at these two wavelengths have not been reported. Gliomas are neuroectodermal tumors. It induces perifocal edema and a massive increase of intracranial pressure for their compression, infiltration, and destruction of brain tissues. It was reported that glioma cells had abnormal chromosome and genetic expression, lower cytochrome-oxydase, creatine phosphate, adenosine triphosphate, and higher deoxyribonucleic acid than normal tissues.14, 15, 16 In the SD C6 glioma model, significant loss of both the mitochondrial enzyme activity and the mitochondrial protein concentration were reported.7 In principle, scattering properties of tissues vary with the light-scattering media in tissues such as the cell membrane and organelle membrane,8 the nuclei,17, 18 and other intracellular organelles, including the mitochondria.7, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 Thus, light scattering can be a possible marker for tissue identification24, 25, 26 and cancer diagnosis.6 A lot of studies have documented that the scattering properties of gray and white matter in the brain differ significantly in the near-infrared range.5, 12, 27, 28, 29, 30 Recently, scattering properties are used to monitor and understand neuronal functions and physiological changes in vitro and in vivo.19, 20, 31, 32 It becomes a more recognized and frequently utilized research approach in the area of neuroscience.30, 31, 32, 33, 34 Because cellular and intracellular organelles of tumors undergo changes in their density, morphological size, and shape, it is expected that light-scattering properties of tumors will differ from that of normal tissues. According to the existing reports, 12, 13, 20, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 the reduced scattering coefficients of tumors were found to be greater or less than normal tissues, dependent on tissue type and detecting wavelength. In this study, we cultured C6 cells to induce cerebral glioma in SD rats. The NIR spectra reflected from glioma were measured by NIRS to determine the reduced scattering coefficient. The results show the reduced scattering coefficient of glioma decreased compared to normal tissues at the same position, which is in good agreement with the results reported by Angell-Petersen 13 The differences in reduced scattering coefficient observed in our in vivo data could be the mixed results of the following aspects:
Although it is expected that the tissue undergoes disorganization within hours after C6 glioma implantation, we were unable to show such a change by the NIR technique on postoperative day 3. However, significant changes were found in our study on postoperative days 10 and 17, which correlate well with the expected pathological changes following glioma cells implantation. The following matters indicated the possibility by using in vivo NIR techniques to identify glioma. First, abnormal changes and their boundaries can be deduced by the curves. On the 10th day after C6 glioma cells were implanted at a depth of in rat brain, there is significant difference between the left and right sides from depth , which means the glioma enlarged, and depth is its upper boundary and depth is its lower boundary. On POD 17, the difference range between the left and right is from depth , which means the volume of glioma is bigger. The upper boundary read from the curve is approximately consistent with the data read from MRI images. Second, the curves show the potential for differentiating a grading scale of gliomas. The histopathological alterations of C6 gliomas classified gliomas on POD 10 into grade II and gliomas on POD 17 into grade III. On the other hand, the of glioma side on POD 17 is lower than that on POD 10; that is, of gliomas of grade III is lower than grade II. However, more studies are needed to work out the differentiating number. We did not observe the significant differences on POD 3. One possible explanation for the failure to detect the differences is due to the small volume of the glioma in its early stage. In the Sprague-Dawley rat C6 gliomas models, gliomas just begin to form a tumorous entity after the implantation.2 Qian 42 in previous research found that the probe used here has a look-ahead distance at , which means the reduced scattering coefficient measured by this system is depending on the contribution of tissues located under the probe. The percentage of intact versus diseased tissues in the range may affect the scattering readings. It would be beneficial to develop a more sensitive NIR probe with a better spatial resolution. A second possibility may be the positioning of the NIR probe. A slight change in positioning angle could affect the reading. This possibility seems unlikely to account for a lack of group differences because there was no systematic difference in probe positioning. However, increased accuracy in probe positioning could be obtained by developing an optic digital scanner that could provide a measurement for the distance around the center of the aiming surface. Such information could feed back to a microprocessor, which would adjust the angle of the micromanipulator. In conclusion, this study reports of normal brain tissue and glioma at two wavelength obtained using an NIRS method and demonstrates that NIRS has the ability to detect cerebral gliomas microinvasively. The results have proven our initial hypothesis and may suggest that the NIR techniques have a potential for intraoperative application to identify gliomas within normal brain tissue. We believe that such a minimally invasive technique with simple, low-cost, and portable aspects could be utilized for multiple applications in the brain and inner body-studies, such as to measure dynamic light scattering changes during external stimulations. The possibility of characterizing light scattering under tumors in vivo may allow scientists to gain insight into tumor physiology from another angle besides tissue hemoglobin oxygenation, which has been done intensively in recent years. AcknowledgmentsThis work was performed in Biophotonics Laboratory of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics and supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30671997). ReferencesF. San-Galli,
P. Vrignaud,
J. Robert,
J. M. Coindre, and
F. Cohadon,
“Assessment of the experimental model of transplanted C6 glioblastoma in Wistar rats,”
J. Neuro-Oncol., 7
(3), 299
–304
(1989). 0167-594X Google Scholar
B. Grobben,
P. De Deyn, and
H. Slegers,
“Rat C6 glioma as experimental model system for the study of glioblastoma growth and invasion,”
Cell Tissue Res., 310
(3), 257
–270
(2002). 0302-766X Google Scholar
X. Zhu,
C. Lu,
B. Xiao,
J. Qiao, and
Y. Sun,
“An experimental study of dendritic cells-mediated immunotherapy against intracranial gliomas in rats,”
J. Neuro-Oncol., 74
(1), 9
–17
(2005). 0167-594X Google Scholar
G. H. Vince,
M. Bendszus,
T. Schweitzer,
“Spontaneous regression of experimental gliomas -An immunohisto chemical and MRI study of the C6 glioma spheroid implantation model,”
Exp. Neurol., 190
(2), 478
–485
(2004). 0014-4886 Google Scholar
M. Johns,
C. A. Giller, and
H. Liu,
“Computational and in vivo investigation of optical reflectance from human brain to assist neurosurgery,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 3
(4), 437
–445
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.429894 1083-3668 Google Scholar
J. R. Mourant,
I. J. Bigio,
J. Boyer,
R. L. Conn,
T. Johnson, and
T. Shimada,
“Spectroscopic diagnosis of bladder cancer with elastic light scattering,”
Lasers Surg. Med., 17
(4), 350
–357
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900170403 0196-8092 Google Scholar
B. Beauvoit,
S. M. Evans,
T. W. Jenkins,
E. E. Miller, and
B. Chance,
“Correlation between the light scattering and the mitochondrial content of normal tissues and transplantable rodent tumors,”
Anal. Biochem., 226
(1), 167
–174
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1205 0003-2697 Google Scholar
J. Beuthan,
O. Minet,
J. Helfmann,
M. Herrig, and
G. Müller,
“The spatial variation of the refractive index in biological cells,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 41 369
–382
(1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/41/3/002 0031-9155 Google Scholar
F. W. Cheong,
S. A. Prahl, and
A. J. Welch,
“A review of the optical properties of biological tissues,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 26
(12), 2166
–2185
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1109/3.64354 0018-9197 Google Scholar
V. M. Morreale,
B. H. Herman,
V. der Minassian,
M. Palkovits,
P. Klubes,
D. Perry,
A. Csiffary, and
A. P. Lee,
“A brain tumor model utilizing stereotactic implantation of a permanent cannula,”
J. Neurosurg., 78
(6), 959
–965
(1993). 0022-3085 Google Scholar
Z. Qian,
R. Chen,
Y. Gu,
C. A. Giller, and
H. Liu,
“In vivo determination of tissue optical properties: reduced scattering coefficient (’s),”
J. Nanjing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 36
(3), 369
–372
(2004). Google Scholar
F. Bevilacqua,
D. Piguet,
P. Marquet,
J. D. Gross,
B. J. Tromberg, and
C. Depeursinge,
“In vivo local determination of tissue optical properties: applications to human brain,”
Appl. Opt., 38
(22), 4939
–4950
(1999). 0003-6935 Google Scholar
E. Angell-Petersen,
H. Hirschberg, and
S. J. Madsen,
“Determination of fluence rate and temperature distribution in the rat brain; implications for photodynamic therapy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 12
(1), 014003
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2709882 1083-3668 Google Scholar
M. E. Law,
K. L. Templeton,
G. Kitange,
J. Smith,
A. Misra,
B. G. Feuerstein, and
R. B. Jenkins,
“Molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosomes 1 and 19 in glioma cell lines,”
Cancer Genet. Cytogenet, 160
(1), 1
–14
(2005). 0165-4608 Google Scholar
S. Cazzaniga,
S. C. Schold,
H. D. Sostman, and
H. C. Charles,
“Effects of therapy on the NMR spectrum of a human glioma line,”
Magn. Reson. Imaging, 12
(6), 945
–950
(1994). 0730-725X Google Scholar
M. S. Yang,
L. C. Yu, and
R. C. Gupta,
“Analysis of changes in energy and redox states in HepG2 hepatoma and C6 glioma cells upon exposure to cadmium,”
Toxicology, 201
(1–3), 105
–113
(2004). 0300-483X Google Scholar
J. Ikeda,
S. Terakawa,
S. Murota,
I. Morita, and
K. Hirakawa,
“Nuclear disintegration as a leading step of glutamate excitotoxicity in brain neurons,”
J. Neurosci. Res., 43
(5), 613
–622
(1996). 0360-4012 Google Scholar
K. Sokolov,
R. Drezek,
K. Gossage, and
R. Richards-Kortum,
“Reflectance spectroscopy with polarized light: is it sensitive to cellular and nuclear morphology,”
Opt. Express, 5
(13), 302
–317
(1999). 1094-4087 Google Scholar
A. M. K. Nilsson,
C. Sturesson,
D. L. Liu, and
S. Andersson-Engels,
“Changes in spectral shape of tissue optical properties in conjunction with laser-induced thermotherapy,”
Appl. Opt., 37
(7), 1256
–1267
(1998). 0003-6935 Google Scholar
G. Zonios,
L. T. Perelman,
V. Backman,
R. Manoharan,
M. Fitzmaurice,
J. van Dam, and
M. S. Feld,
“Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of human adenomatous colon polyps in vivo,”
Appl. Opt., 38
(31), 6628
–6637
(1999). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.006628 0003-6935 Google Scholar
B. Beauvoit,
T. Kitai, and
B. Chance,
“Contribution of the mitochondrial compartment to the optical properties of the rat liver: A theoretical and practical approach,”
Biophys. J., 67
(6), 2501
–2510
(1994). 0006-3495 Google Scholar
C. A. Giller,
M. Johns, and
H. Liu,
“Use of an intracranial near-infrared probe for localization during stereotactic surgery for movement disorders,”
J. Neurosurg., 93
(3), 498
–505
(2000). 0022-3085 Google Scholar
F. Fujii,
Y. Nodasaka,
G. Nishimura, and
M. Tamura,
“Anoxia induces matrix shrinkage accompanied by an increase in light scattering in isolated brain mitochondria,”
Brain Res., 999
(1), 29
–39
(2004). 0006-8993 Google Scholar
C. A. Giller,
H. Liu,
P. Gurnani,
S. Victor,
U. Yazdani, and
D. C. German,
“Validation of a near-infrared probe for detection of thin intracranial white matter structures,”
J. Neurosurg., 98 1299
–1306
(2003). 0022-3085 Google Scholar
F. Bevilacqua,
“Local optical characterization of biological tissues in vitro and in vivo,”
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,
(1998). Google Scholar
F. Bevilacqua,
D. Piguet,
P. Marguet,
J. D. Gross,
D. B. Jakubowski,
V. Venugopalan, B. J. Tromberg, and
C. Depeursinge,
“Superficial tissue optical property determination using spatially resolved measurements close to the source: comparison with frequency domain photon migration measurements,”
Proc. SPIE, 3597 540
–547
(1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.356857 0277-786X Google Scholar
F. A. Duck, Physical Properties of Tissue: A Comprehensive Reference Book, Academic Press, San Diego
(1990). Google Scholar
E. Okada,
M. Firbank,
L. J. Johnson,
S. R. Arridge,
M. Cope, and
D. T. Delpy,
“Theoretical and experimental investigation of near-infrared light propagation in a model of the adult head,”
Appl. Opt., 36
(1), 21
–31
(1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002459900053 0003-6935 Google Scholar
L. J. Johnson,
D. F. Hanley, and
N. V. Thakor,
“Optical light scatter imaging of cellular and sub-cellular morphology changes in stressed rat hippocampal slices,”
J. Neurosci. Methods, 98
(1), 21
–31
(2000). 0165-0270 Google Scholar
P. G. Aitken,
D. Fayuk,
G. G. Somjen, and
D. A. Turner,
“Use of intrinsic optical signals to monitor physiological changes in brain tissue slices,”
Methods, 18
(2), 91
–103
(1999). 1046-2023 Google Scholar
B. S. Kristal and
J. M. Dubinsky,
“Mitochondrial permeability transition in the central nervous system: induction by calcium cycling-dependent and independent pathways,”
J. Neurochem., 69
(2), 524
–538
(1997). 0022-3042 Google Scholar
R. D. Andrew,
C. R. Jarvis, and
A. S. Obeidat,
“Potential sources of intrinsic optical signals imaged in live brain slices,”
Methods, 18
(2), 185
–196
(1999). 1046-2023 Google Scholar
M. Haller,
S. L. Mironov, and
D. W. Richter,
“Intrinsic optical signals in respiratory brain stem regions of mice: neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and metabolic stress,”
J. Neurophysiol., 86 412
–421
(2001). 0022-3077 Google Scholar
Y. Nomura,
F. Fujii,
C. Sato, and
M. Tamura,
“Exchange transfusion with fluorocarbon for studying synaptically evoked optical signal in rat cortex,”
Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc, 5
(1), 10
–15
(2000). 1385-299X Google Scholar
S. C. Gebhart,
W. C. Lin, and
A. Mahadevan-Jansen,
“In vitro determination of normal and neoplastic human brain tissue optical properties using inverse adding-doubling,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 51
(8), 2011
–2027
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/8/004 0031-9155 Google Scholar
P. R. Bargo,
S. A. Prahl,
T. T. Goodell,
R. A. Sleven,
G. Koval,
G. Blair, and
S. L. Jacques,
“In vivo determination of optical properties of normal and tumor tissue with white light reflectance and an empirical light transport model during endoscopy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 10
(3), 034018
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1921907 1083-3668 Google Scholar
J. P. Ritz,
C. M. Isbert,
A. Roggan,
C. T. Germer,
G. Mueller, and
H. J. Buhr,
“Correlation of intrahepatic light and temperature distribution in laser-induced thermotherapy of liver tumors and liver tissue,”
Proc. SPIE, 3565 18
–23
(1999). 0277-786X Google Scholar
C. Holmer,
K. S. Lehmann,
J. Wanken,
C. Reissfelder,
A. Roggan,
G. Mueller,
H. J. Buhr, and
J. P. Ritz,
“Optical properties of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 12
(1), 014025
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2564793 1083-3668 Google Scholar
D. Grosenick,
K. T. Moesta,
M. Moller,
“Analysis of time-domain optical mammograms recorded from more than 150 patients,”
Proc. SPIE, 5693 308
–317
(2005). 0277-786X Google Scholar
S. S. Barbour,
R. L. Barbour,
P. C. Koo,
H. L. Graber, and
J. Chang,
“Mapping of photon distribution and imaging of MR-derived anatomically accurate optical models of the female breast,”
Proc. SPIE, 2389 835
–850
(1995). 0277-786X Google Scholar
D. Schiffer, Brain Tumors: Biology, Pathology and Clinical References, Springer, Berlin
(1997). Google Scholar
Z. Qian,
S. V. Sunder,
Y. Gu,
C. A. Giller, and
H. Liu,
“Look-ahead distance of a fiber probe used to assist neurosurgery: Phantom and Monte Carlo study,”
Opt. Express, 11
(16), 1844
–1855
(2003). 1094-4087 Google Scholar
|