|
Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy is a robust imaging modality that has been proven to be sensitive in the detection of chemicals and molecular species in the cluttered environments.1–3 The examples specific to biomedical imaging are the detection of cancerous tumors4,5 and metabolic changes in the human fundus, aimed to characterize and provide better disease prognosis. Research efforts in the field reported various fluorescence biomarkers and structural contrast mechanisms to investigate detection capabilities for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, etc.6–12 These systems utilize point detection by raster scanning and result in long acquisition and processing times. Our group has developed a new imaging method utilizing autofluorescence temporal signatures to test the efficacy of a direct image contrast in various tissues. This technique does not require setting a priori assumptions on the fluorescence decay behavior and displays a contrast map based on relative changes in lifetime (Fig. 1). The contrast image can be acquired and processed in less than a second.5,13,14 In this letter, we demonstrate the system’s capability in imaging full-field human fundus with low-excitation fluence and show structural variations in vivo. 1.System and MethodsThe illumination scheme in the system relies on a wide-field illumination by a diffused light emitting diode (LED) light providing excitation at 407 nm. Using this wavelength in imaging, the retina is possible in pseudophakic patients, as the intraocular lens efficiently transmits blue wavelengths and assists in reducing the autofluorescence signal found in crystalline lenses.15,16 Blue wavelengths have also been reported to efficiently excite metabolic fluorophores such as flavin adenine dinucleotide and lipofuscin, among other fluorophores in the retina and pigment epithelium, with strong signals from structural fluorophores, collagen, and elastin.12,17–19 These signals exhibit a broad fluorescence emission spectrum that can be imaged using our detection scheme and potentially used to detect structural and metabolic changes in the retina. The system was built on an existing fundus camera (Zeiss, FF4), which uses conventional optics (not confocal) with an indirect illumination scheme to record color images and fluorescein angiographs from a human retina. Modifications were made to enable imaging of the retina’s autofluorescence signals (Fig. 2) and include an intensified CCD (ICCD) imager (Andor, iStar 334T) and an LED (Thorlabs, LED405E) set to emit 20-ns long square pulses with 407-nm wavelength and average power of at the cornea. Utilizing a blue wavelength with low power levels and flat-top pulses with low average and peak power has been found safe both by the ANSI standard for ocular exposure20,21 and reported DNA-damage threshold statistics.22 The LED light passes through two ultraviolet (UV) optical filters (Thorlabs, FEL0400) to ensure no residual UV light reaches the imaged eye. Another filter is positioned in front of the ICCD to block reflected light and record fluorescence signals from the retina at a central wavelength of 460- and 60-nm bandwidth (Semrock, FF01-460/60-25). A high-power pulse generator (Avtech, AVR-E3-B-P) drives the LED and triggers the camera operation. The relatively low duty cycle () and the LED impedance matching network ensure optical output without damaging the LED and maintain wavelength stability for extended periods. 2.Results and DiscussionEx vivo porcine eyes were used as a calibration model for the camera before in vivo experiments were performed, as they exhibit similar properties to the human eye. Six fresh eyes, kept in ice to slow tissue deterioration and delivered within 2 h of harvesting, were acquired from a local slaughterhouse in adherence to the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research. No Institutional Review Board approval was required. The chosen excitation wavelength transmits through the intraocular structures, i.e., lens and vitreous, and excites the retina and blood vessels (Fig. 3). All of the porcine eyes resulted in low-detail images due to various degrees of corneal edema (high hydration levels that cause opaqueness). Contrast in these images originates primarily from the lifetime difference between blood vessels and retinal connective tissue fluorophores, collagen, and elastin. The contribution of the lens’ strong autofluorescence signal could explain variations in contrast.17 The in vivo imaging experiment included six pseudophakic volunteer patients from the Stein Eye Institute at University of California, Los Angeles. The experiment was approved by the Internal Review Board for human subjects. Three out of the six patients were imaged successfully during system optimization and operator training. Two of the patients were diagnosed with dry AMD [Figs. 4(a)–4(c) and 4(g)–4(i)] and one patient with diabetic retinopathy [Figs. 4(d)–4(f)]. Images of the diabetic patient show low signal levels and bright spots (hyperfluorescence) of macular edema.23 The fluorescence intensity map shows better contrast than the lifetime data, and more data are needed in order to validate possible imaging utility for this condition. The first AMD patient [Figs. 4(a)–4(c)] displays high noise level, though the basic lifetime contrast between the optic disk and the surrounding retina is visible. Figures 4(b) and 4(c) were taken at different times. Images of the second AMD patient [Figs. 4(g)–4(i)] exhibit higher detail level and contrast due to optics optimizations. The lifetime image [Fig. 4(h)] shows signals of the optic disk and blood vessels’ margins generated mainly from connective tissue fluorophores. Longer lifetime values in the fovea region are also visible and correlate to previously reported lifetime changes in AMD patients.24 However, more patient data are needed in order to demonstrate reproducibility and statistical significance. The current fundus camera was not designed for lifetime imaging and has low photon efficiency, though basic fluorescence lifetime data displayed show the robustness of the technique. Diagnosis of AMD, specifically lipofuscin distribution, could possibly be achieved with a modern fundus imager that has higher photon efficiency and reduced reflections. 3.ConclusionsWe have shown a proof of concept of our technique in imaging retina autofluorescence lifetime signatures. Implementation of this imaging method on a modern fundus camera could offer an alternative to existing technologies, using fast fundus imaging without raster scanning. Further improvement of the illumination pulse profile and algorithm optimizations could extract more information and increase signal-to-noise ratio. Implementation of multispectral excitation schemes in future research efforts could also provide better discrimination and contrast of endogenous fluorophores to detect metabolic processes and morphological changes in point of care macular diagnosis. AcknowledgmentsThis work was sponsored by the Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Grant No. W81XWH-12-2-0075. Support of this study was provided by the Stein Eye Institute by donation of equipment. Imaging of patients was approved by University of California, Los Angeles Institutional Review Board, IRB 14-000767. ReferencesN. Mazumder et al.,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging of alterations to cellular metabolism by domain 2 of the hepatitis C virus core protein,”
PLoS One, 8
(6), e66738
(2013). POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar
T. S. Blacker et al.,
“Separating NADH and NADPH fluorescence in live cells and tissues using FLIM,”
Nat. Commun., 5 3936
(2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4936 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar
J.-M. I. Maarek et al.,
“Time-resolved fluorescence spectra of arterial fluorescent compounds: reconstruction with the Laguerre expansion technique,”
Photochem. Photobiol., 71
(2), 178
–187
(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2000)0710178TRFSOA2.0.CO2 PHCBAP 0031-8655 Google Scholar
Y. Sun et al.,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy for brain tumor image-guided surgery,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(5), 056022
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3486612 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
A. Papour et al.,
“Optical imaging for brain tissue characterization using relative fluorescence lifetime imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 18
(6), 060504
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.060504 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
M. Hammer et al.,
“In vivo and in vitro investigations of retinal fluorophores in age-related macular degeneration by fluorescence lifetime imaging,”
Proc. SPIE, 7183 71832S
(2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.807943 Google Scholar
D. Schweitzer et al.,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy in type 2 diabetic patients who have no signs of diabetic retinopathy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 20
(6), 061106
(2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.6.061106 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
C. Dysli, S. Wolf and M. S. Zinkernagel,
“Fluorescence lifetime imaging in retinal artery occlusion,”
Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci., 56
(5), 3329
(2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-16203 Google Scholar
C. Dysli et al.,
“Quantitative analysis of fluorescence lifetime measurements of the macula using the fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscope in healthy subjects,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 55
(4), 2106
–2113
(2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13627 IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar
A. von Rückmann, F. W. Fitzke and A. C. Bird,
“Fundus autofluorescence in age-related macular disease imaged with a laser scanning ophthalmoscope,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 38
(2), 478
–486
(1997). IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar
D. Schweitzer et al.,
“Evaluation of time-resolved autofluorescence images of the ocular fundus,”
Proc. SPIE, 5141 8
–17
(2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.499641 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
M. Islam et al.,
“pH dependence of the fluorescence lifetime of FAD in solution and in cells,”
Int. J. Mol. Sci., 14
(1), 1952
–1963
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms14011952 1422-0067 Google Scholar
P.-C. Jiang, W. S. Grundfest and O. M. Stafsudd,
“Quasi-real-time fluorescence imaging with lifetime dependent contrast,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 16
(8), 086001
(2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3609229 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
A. J. Sherman et al.,
“Normalized fluorescence lifetime imaging for tumor identification and margin delineation,”
Proc. SPIE, 8572 85721H
(2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2013414 Google Scholar
J. A. Zuclich et al.,
“Near-UV/blue light-induced fluorescence in the human lens: potential interference with visual function,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 10
(4), 044021
(2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1990163 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
E. A. Boettner and J. R. Wolter,
“Transmission of the ocular media,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 1
(6), 776
–783
(1962). IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar
D. Schweitzer et al.,
“Spectral and time-resolved studies on ocular structures,”
Proc. SPIE, 6628 662807
(2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.726701 Google Scholar
A. D. Marmorstein et al.,
“Spectral profiling of autofluorescence associated with lipofuscin, bruch’s membrane, and sub-RPE deposits in normal and AMD eyes,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 43
(7), 2435
–2441
(2002). IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar
J. R. Sparrow et al.,
“A2E, a lipofuscin fluorophore, in human retinal pigmented epithelial cells in culture,”
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 40
(12), 2988
–2995
(1999). IOVSDA 0146-0404 Google Scholar
American National Standard for the Safe Use of Laser, Laser Institute of America, Orlando, Florida
(2007). Google Scholar
F. C. Delori, R. H. Webb and D. H. Sliney,
“Maximum permissible exposures for ocular safety (ANSI 2000), with emphasis on ophthalmic devices,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 24
(5), 1250
–1265
(2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.001250 JOAOD6 0740-3232 Google Scholar
R. P. Sinha and D. P. Häder,
“UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review,”
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 1
(4), 225
–236
(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B201230H PPSHCB 1474-905X Google Scholar
A. Pece et al.,
“Autofluorescence imaging of cystoid macular edema in diabetic retinopathy,”
Ophthalmologica, 224
(4), 230
–235
(2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000260229 OPHTAD 0030-3755 Google Scholar
D. Schweitzer et al.,
“In vivo measurement of time-resolved autofluorescence at the human fundus,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 9
(6), 1214
–1222
(2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.1806833 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
|