Is it blur or is it texture? An analysis of computational blur and texture measures commonly used in medical image analysis

Andrew William Chen; Murray H. Loew

doi:10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11920

24 May 2023 Is it blur or is it texture? An analysis of computational blur and texture measures commonly used in medical image analysis

Andrew William Chen, Murray H. Loew

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Medical Imaging, Vol. 10, Issue S1, S11920 (May 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11920

Abstract

Purpose

In this work, we endeavor to investigate how texture information may contribute to the response of a blur measure (BM) with motivation rooted in mammography. This is vital as the interpretation of the BM is typically not evaluated with respect to texture present in an image. We are particularly concerned with lower scales of blur ( ≤ 1 mm) as this blur is least likely to be detected but can still have a detrimental effect on detectability of microcalcifications.

Approach

Three sets of linear models, where BM response was modeled as a linear combination of texture information determined by texture measures (TMs), were constructed from three different datasets of equal-blur-level images; one of computer-generated mammogram-like clustered lumpy background (CLB) images and two image sets derived from the Brodatz texture images. The linear models were refined by removing those TMs that are not significantly non-zero across all three datasets for each BM. We use five levels of Gaussian blur to blur the CLB images and assess the ability of the BMs and TMs to separate the images based on blur level.

Results

We found that many TMs used frequently in the reduced linear models, mimicked the structure of the BMs that they modeled. Surprisingly, while none of the BMs could separate the CLB images across all levels of blur, a group of TMs could. These TMs occurred infrequently in the reduced linear models meaning that they rely on different information compared with that used by the BMs.

Conclusion

These results confirm our hypothesis that BMs can be influenced by texture information in an image. That a subset of TMs performed better than all BMs on the blur classification problem with the CLB images further shows that conventional BMs may not be the optimal tool for blur classification in mammogram images.

Citation Download Citation

Andrew William Chen and Murray H. Loew "Is it blur or is it texture? An analysis of computational blur and texture measures commonly used in medical image analysis," Journal of Medical Imaging 10(S1), S11920 (24 May 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11920

Received: 19 December 2022; Accepted: 1 May 2023; Published: 24 May 2023

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $24.00

Non-members: $28.00 ADD TO CART

JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Thulium

Data modeling

Mammography

Medical imaging

Image classification

Diamond

Histograms

Purpose

Approach

Results

Conclusion

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years