Open Access
25 May 2024 Solution-based Sb2Se3 thin films for microphotonics
Author Affiliations +
Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Abstract

The development of functional chalcogenide optical phase change materials holds significant promise for advancing optics and photonics applications. Our comprehensive investigation into the solution processing of Sb2Se3 thin films presents a systematic approach from solvent exploration to substrate coating through drop-casting methods and heat treatments. By employing characterization techniques such as scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction, we reveal crucial insights into the structural, compositional, and morphological properties of the films as well as demonstrated techniques for control over these features to ensure requisite optical quality. Our findings, compared with currently reported deposition techniques, highlight the potential of solution deposition as a route for scalable Sb2Se3 film processing.

1.

Introduction

Phase change materials (PCMs) are a type of chalcogenide media that are capable of undergoing dramatic property changes upon structural transformation from their amorphous to crystalline states.14 PCMs are widely known for their ability to store information through this reversible transition between their amorphous and crystalline phases, which can be triggered by external factors, such as heat, electric current, or optical pulses.1 PCMs, largely the compositions Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST) and AgxInySb2Te (AIST),1,5 have been used in applications including optical data storage and electronic memories. However, these common PCMs exhibit a large absorption loss in one or both states, which limits their functionality and overall use in optical device applications, such as in microphotonic circuits.6,7 PCMs for such devices are typically referred to as optical PCMs (O-PCMs).

New PCM compositions, including the chalcogenide alloy compositions Ge2Sb2Se4Te, Sb2S3, Sb2Se3, Ge2Sb2Te3S2, and In3SbTe2, have been developed as low-loss alternatives, specifically tailored for use in such photonic applications.813 Here, we focus on antimony triselenide (Sb2Se3) as a low-loss, reversible alternative to commercially available PCMs.10 Sb2Se3 was first studied about 60 years ago for its use in thermoelectric semiconductors.14,15 More recently, Sb2Se3 has been investigated as a solar cell absorber material due to its bandgap energy of 1.2 eV, yielding strong absorption in the visible region.15,16 Sb2Se3 has a reported high refractive index contrast of Δn=0.77 at λ=1.55  μm15 and low loss, which makes it a unique PCM candidate for telecommunications, metamaterials structures, integrated nanophotonics in the infrared region.4,9,10,17 These studies have focused on Sb2Se3 films deposited by physical vapor deposition (PVD) techniques, such as thermal evaporation and radio frequency (RF) sputtering.15,1823

Solution processing offers a cost-effective, large-area, and scalable alternative to PVD for chalcogenide thin film deposition. Solution deposition of chalcogenide glass (ChG) films is a well-practiced technique dating back to the 1980s, mostly centered on As-Se-S-Sb-Ge–based materials and other ChGs.2430 Since then it has been used to create waveguides, photonic crystals, and micro-lenses as well as other optical components.3136 However, reports on solution-processed chalcogenide PCMs have been scarce to date8,3740 and their applications in optical devices have not been explored, to the best of our knowledge.41,42

In this paper, we report solution deposition as a potentially low-cost, large-area, scalable coating technique for the O-PCM Sb2Se3. We detail the solution processing of Sb2Se3 thin films from solvent exploration to substrate coating, heat treatments, and resultant film quality. When referring to the prepared alloy and solvent mixture, we use the term “ink,” and when referring to a film that has gone through the baking and evaporation processes and remains on the substrate, we use the term “solution-derived (SD)” films. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to measure the particle/aggregate size of Sb2Se3 in the prepared ink solution prior to deposition. SD Sb2Se3 films are then characterized using white light interferometer (WLI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD). These tools provide insights into the film’s structural, compositional, and morphological properties and enable the correlation of processing conditions with resulting properties and functionalities. This work not only contributes to the advancement of PCMs for photonics applications but also demonstrates a systematic approach to the fabrication, processing, and characterization of SD PCM films.

2.

Solution Processing and Drop Cast Methods

2.1.

Alloy Formation

Boules of Sb2Se3 were prepared by a melt quenching technique. High purity (4N) antimony (Sb), and sulfur (S) (Alfa Aesar) were stored in a glove box under a controlled atmosphere (H2O<1  ppm and O2<0.1  ppm). Alloy elemental materials were batched in a silica ampoule, which was then sealed under vacuum (102  Torr) with a hydrogen/oxygen torch. The ampoule was then placed in a rocking furnace and heated 750°C for 12 h. After the dwell period, the glass was air-quench at 650°C. The alloy was crushed in a ball mill for 2 h and subsequently sieved (75  μm) using an ultrasonic sieving system (MTI Corporation) in a glove box.

2.2.

Precursor Solution

Precursor solutions were prepared in a nitrogen-filled glove box (H2O and O2<0.1  ppm) to prevent surface oxidation of the deposited film. Sb2Se3 precursor inks with 1.0 wt. % loading levels of alloy in solvent were prepared in a 9:1 ethylene diamine (EDA) and ethane thiol (EtSH) solution mixture by stirring at room temperature for 30 min. This solution chemistry has been successfully applied to a wide array of chalcogenide compositions.26,4345 The resulting Sb-Se ink was stable at room temperature and deemed not photosensitive. A control experiment showed that Sb2Se3 possesses negligible solubility toward EDA alone in the absence of EtSH, defining the solvent mixture chosen for ink solutions. The films were prepared by drop-casting (20  μl) Sb2Se3 ink onto a TiO2 (4 nm) coated Si wafer. A TiO2-coated Si wafer was chosen as a substrate as such coating exhibited improved wettability of the solvent as compared to Si wafers alone. For transmission measurements, Sb2Se3 ink (5  μl) was deposited onto a ZnSe substrate for infrared transmission tests. The drop-casted film was soft baked at 50°C for 20 min, followed by a hard bake at 190°C for 2 h to produce Sb2Se3 thin films. The two-step heat treatment has been shown in prior work to reduce pinholes and cracking in rapidly evaporated films, which are detrimental to the resulting film’s optical quality.30

2.3.

Material Characterization

The soft and hard-bake protocols were determined by monitoring the rate of solvent evaporation from an ink-coated ZnSe substrate using a ThermoFisher Nicolet IS5 FTIR spectrometer. WLI Zygo NewView 8000 was used to measure film thickness and roughness upon heat treatment to quantify how processing affects film properties. A Zeiss Ultra 55 FEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to study film morphology and film thickness on the SD Sb2Se3 thin films prepared on TiO2-coated Si wafer. The Thermo Scientific Noran System 7 electron dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used to identify the elemental composition of the film. A Malveran Zetasizer Nano ZSZEN 3600 DLS instrument with a particle detection range of 0.3 nm to 10  μm was used to measure the particle size of Sb2Se3 molecular clusters in the ink. XRD characterization of the thin films was done by grazing incidence with a PANalytical Empyrean system with a sealed Cu Kα tube with an incidence angle at ω=2  deg at room temperature. Raman characterization (Horiba LabRam HR Evolution Nano) was performed on reference thermally evaporated (TE) and SD films of Sb2Se3 in air at λ=532  nm to investigate film chemical structure. Figure 1 shows the overall preparation method of Sb2Se3 thin films via the drop-casting technique.

Fig. 1

Illustration of the Sb-Se precursor solution in 9:1 EDA: EtSH solution and the preparation of Sb2Se3 films.

JOM_4_3_031203_f001.png

3.

Results and Discussion

3.1.

Solvent Evaporation

The Sb2Se3 ink (5  μl) was drop-casted on a cleaned ZnSe substrate to ascertain the maximum temperature and time required for complete solvent evaporation. Residual solvent in PCM films leads to undesirable absorption loss at bands associated with solvent-chemistry bonds, in the infrared. The extent of solvent evaporation was measured by monitoring the disappearance of the solvent (EDA and EtSH) absorption peaks with temperature and time. It is easy to discern preferential evaporation since EDA absorption peaks are observed at λ=6.27, 11.48, and 12.3  μm, whereas in EtSH peaks are at λ=3.37, 6.9, 7.78, 10.5, and 13.3  μm. Figure 2 shows the transmission spectra of the ink-coated ZnSe substrate baked under different times/temperatures. It was noted that multi-solvent solutions such as those made in this study from EDA and EtSH possess slightly different (preferential) evaporation rates. Hence, one might expect variation in the decrease in absorption bands associated with respective solvent signatures as seen here. The majority of the solution (comprised primarily of EDA) was evaporated during the first soft-bake protocol at 50°C for 30 min. Higher temperatures were needed for the thiol-containing solvent. Further baking of the film from 50°C to 120°C for up to 90 min did not result in complete evaporation of the thiol as represented by the presence of peaks at λ=10.5 and 13.3  μm as well as the scattering tail toward lower wavelengths. The short-wavelength tail may be due to heat-treatment-induced (partial) crystallization of the film or evidence of small-scale particle clusters that were not sufficiently eliminated with heat treatment, which results in scatter loss. Hard-baking the film at 195°C for 2 h allowed complete film consolidation, resulting in full evaporation of the solvent, therefore confirming the necessary temperature at which the substrate should be baked. The lack of scatter tail in the final hard-baked film is indicative of the merging of the molecular droplet with heat treatment and their scatter, shown at shorter times/low temperatures, goes away with heat treatment. In the case of a film with high (15 to 20  μl) drop casted volume, the final film will likely show a scatter tail associated with incomplete film formation.

Fig. 2

Transmission measurements of film deposited on ZnSe substrate as a function of bake protocol.

JOM_4_3_031203_f002.png

3.2.

Surface Measurements and Particle Size

Since the ultimate goal of this work is to integrate the Sb2Se3 thin films onto photonic devices exemplified by silicon-on-insulator (SOI) waveguides (possibly coated with a TiO2 layer as needed), from this point onward we continue our work on TiO2 coated Si wafers instead of ZnSe as the substrate in a glove box. Figure 3 shows the surface morphology details of the films as a function of the hard-bake protocol. The film displayed in Fig. 3(a) was hard-baked at 175°C for 2 h whereas the film displayed in Fig. 3(e) was hard-baked at 190°C for 2 h. Figures 3(a) and 3(e) show WLI images of the center of the films with an average root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of 132 and 23 nm, respectively. SEM images of films 3a and 3e are shown in Fig. 3(b) (we will call this film 3b) and Fig. 3(f) (we will call this film 3f), respectively. SEM images revealed that for film 3b, despite solvent removal, the resulting alloy film is not uniform. Here, one can observe an interconnected network of the particles and evidence of porosity exhibiting a thick mesh-like structure comprised of relatively large gaps down to the substrate. Contrarily, segregated particles of Sb2Se3 (diameters of 280±50  nm) were visualized in film 3f, and the gaps were smaller with increased homogeneity.

Fig. 3

(a) WLI image of the center of the film baked at 175°C. (b) SEM image of film baked at 175°C, (c) EDS measurements of film 3b baked at 175°C (scale bar 200 nm), (d) optical image of the film 3b dropcasted on Si wafer (scale bar 1 mm), (e) WLI image of the center of the film baked at 190°C, (f) SEM image of the film baked at 190°C (scale bar 200 nm), (g) EDS measurements of film 3f baked at 190°C, and (h) optical image of the film 3f dropcasted on Si wafer (scalebar 1 mm).

JOM_4_3_031203_f003.png

The EDS spectra revealing elemental compositions of the films are shown in Fig. 3(c) (for film 3b) and Fig. 3(g) (for film 3f). As it can be seen, the presence of a small percentage of sulfur (2.5 at. %) due to incomplete evaporation of thiol (resulting in soft film) is the reason behind the aggregation in film 3b. On the other hand, hard-baking the film to 190°C resulted in complete evaporation of the solvent as shown in Fig. 3(f).

In film 3f, particles with an average length (280±50  nm) were observed. To further understand the aggregation/agglomeration of Sb2Se3 in the film, we analyzed the ink using DLS. The analysis was done at λ=632  nm with 1 wt. % Sb2Se3 dissolved in the ratio of EDA:EtSH (9:1). Figure 4 shows a plot of intensity versus particle size. Here, Sb2Se3 was dissolved in solution and measured at room temperature; this resulted in an average particle size of 260 nm, which was close to the particle size observed in film 3f. These data support the prior evidence that shows that with the soft and hard bake protocol of 50°C for 20 min and 190°C for 2 h the particles did not aggregate fully. To further study the impact of temperature on the particle size, 1 wt. % Sb2Se3 was dissolved in EDA:EtSH at 50°C for 20 min followed by DLS measurement. Figure 4 shows that the average particle size of Sb2Se3 in the ink reduced from 260 to 110  nm upon being dissolved at an elevated temperature of 50°C. To confirm this observation, 20  μl Sb2Se3 (also dissolved at 50°C) was drop-casted and dried on Si substrate and imaged via SEM. Figure 4 inset image shows the SEM of the film with an average particle length of 150±30  nm, confirming the results of the DLS.

Fig. 4

DLS measurements of the average particle size of Sb2Se3 in the ink dissolved at 50°C with inset SEM image of the film. The spectrum of the pristine EDA:EtSH (9:1) solution (blue line) with no dissolved Sb2Se3 material shows a wide range of particulates with an average peak at 350 nm. The spectrum of the 1 wt. % Sb2Se3 dissolved in the ratio of EDA:EtSH (9:1) (green line) dissolved and measured at room temperature resulted in an average particle size of 260 nm. The spectrum of the 1 wt. % Sb2Se3 dissolved in the ratio of EDA:EtSH (9:1) (red line) dissolved at an elevated temperature of 50°C showed a reduction in average particle size down to 110 nm. The inset SEM image is of a film created using 1 wt. % Sb2Se3 dissolved at an elevated temperature of 50°C in the ratio of EDA:EtSH (9:1). This film depicts crystallites with an average particle diameter 150 nm, confirming the DLS measurements.

JOM_4_3_031203_f004.png

3.3.

Film Thickness

An important factor in incorporating the SD films for photonic applications is the ability to control thickness as a parameter. Film thickness depends not only on the loading levels of the alloy (Sb2Se3) in the solvent mixture but also on the drop-casted volume of the ink deposited onto the substrate prior to solvent evaporation. Following an investigation to evaluate optimal loading levels, different volumes of the 1 wt. % Sb2Se3 ink were drop-casted on Si substrates and dried using the soft- and hard-bake protocol described above. The plot in Fig. 5(a) shows a plot of film thickness versus drop-casted volume. Here, the resulting, post-heat treat film thickness ranges from 200 to 500 nm; Fig. 5(b) shows an SEM image of the cross-sectional side view of the film with 200  nm thickness.

Fig. 5

(a) Post heat treated Sb2Se3 film thickness (nm) versus drop casted volume (μl) and (b) SEM image of film cross-section of a 200 nm thick film (scale bar 100 nm).

JOM_4_3_031203_f005.png

3.4.

X-Ray Diffraction and Raman Spectra

The SD-derived films were further evaluated via XRD and Raman spectroscopy followed by comparison with the films deposited via thermal evaporation. The TE films were deposited from a stoichiometric powdered Sb2Se3 source in a custom deposition system. Films are deposited at a pressure of 106  Torr and substrate temperatures are monitored to be about 40°C.4648 To confirm the presence of Sb2Se3 in situ XRD measurements were performed on film 3b and film 3f at room temperature [Fig. 6(a)], following solvent removal via the heat treatment protocols noted above. The XRD of the SD films were then compared with the TE as-deposited and annealed (190°C for 2 h) films of the Sb2Se3 alloy. The as-deposited TE films were amorphous in nature whereas the TE annealed film was crystalline. The films deposited at 175°C were also found to be predominantly amorphous in nature, and as was discussed above due to incomplete evaporation of solvent in this film. Film deposited at 190°C contained a mixture of amorphous and crystalline peaks. The predominant peaks of crystalline Sb2Se3 were observed in the post-heat-treated film at 2θ values of 16.874 deg, 31.160 deg, and 32.220 deg.34 The presence/absence of some crystallization peaks in the film baked at 190°C confirms that the film undergoes crystallization during the hard baking process which is an important step to ensure complete solvent evaporation. No additional peaks were found during the solvent evaporation process that would correspond to the detection possible oxidation of Sb2Se3 into Sb2O5 or Sb2O3 peaks.

Fig. 6

(a) XRD measurements of film 3b (175°C) and film 3f (190°C) and comparison of the peaks with TE as-deposited and annealed films, (b) Raman spectra of the TE amorphous and annealed films (measured at 300 mW, 2  μm spot size), and comparison with SD Sb2Se3 film measured at different powers.

JOM_4_3_031203_f006.png

Raman measurements were performed on both TE and SD films (300 mW, 2  μm spot size), in order to confirm the presence of Sb2Se3 in the SD film. The Raman spectrum for the as-deposited TE film showed no distinct peaks recognized over noise. For both the TE and SD annealed films, the Raman spectra displayed peaks at 191 and 210  cm1, these peaks are commonly assigned to the Sb2Se3 phase, particularly the Ag mode of the Sb–Se–Sb bending vibrations of Sb2Se3.49 Having these two peaks present in both the TE and SD films indicates common structural development occurring during annealing of both films regardless of processing. It should be noted that no lower frequency peaks were observed in the as-deposited or annealed TE or SD Sb2Se3 films in our study. This is likely be due to differences in processing, heat treatments, annealing, and interaction volume, between our film and the references. For both peaks at 191 and 210  cm1, the full-width at half-maximum for the annealed SD films is almost twice (24  cm1 compared to 40  cm1) than that of the annealed TE films, indicating reduced crystallinity for the SD films, as was also confirmed via XRD. In the SD film, a new peak at 255  cm1 emerged, this peak was assigned to Sb2O3 and indicated that the Raman laser interaction with the film induced further annealing which resulted in oxidation of the film.49 The Sb2O3 peak at 255  cm1 did not form when the SD film was remeasured at a lower power of 30 mW with 4  μm spot size. The SD films appear to be more sensitive to oxidation than the TE film. Future Raman characterization will need to take this oxidation behavior into account. It may be necessary to perform Raman under an inert N2 atmosphere to prevent oxidation during measurement.

4.

Silicon on Insulator Microheaters

Recently, we have reported using silicon-on-insulator (SOI) microheater arrays as a multi-functional platform capable of characterizing the structural, optical, kinetic, thermal, and cycling behavior of optical PCMs.12 We have shown the platform’s capability to conduct in situ, quantitative analyses of various aspects of PCM thin films, including phase composition, optical constants, temperature profiles, time-temperature-transformation diagrams,13 cycling endurance, and material uniformity.

A combination of the micro-heater platform with the SD film processing described herein presents intriguing opportunities for new PCM discovery and process development. The micro-heater platform can be integrated with combinatorial solution deposition techniques, such as inkjet printing methods, streamlining the process of high-throughput screening for new compositions of PCMs. Its in situ characterization capabilities also facilitate efficient screening of heat treatment conditions of SD PCM films, similar to what we presented in Sec. 3 but with much-enhanced throughput. The large-area scalable SD technique is also commensurate with the wafer-scale micro-heater platform. Our next step will involve exploring the deposition and characterization of SD films on the SOI micro-heaters.

5.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study delves into the exploration of Sb2Se3 SD thin films as a low-loss alternative for PCMs in optical applications. The unique properties of Sb2Se3, including its high refractive index contrast, low toxicity, and bandgap energy, make it a promising candidate for integrated nanophotonics. This paper details the comprehensive solution processing of Sb2Se3 thin films, addressing key aspects, such as film morphology, composition, and thickness control via loading levels, the drop-casting volume as well as the impact of baking temperature on the film morphology. XRD analysis of the films revealed the change in intensity of Sb2Se3 crystallization peaks as the hard bake temperature for the solvent evaporation is increased from 175°C to 190°C. Further analysis of this film via in situ XRD from room temperature to 400°C under an inert atmosphere will be done in future work. Raman analysis of the SD films and their comparison with the well-studied TE films showed peaks at 191 and 210  cm1 which are commonly assigned to Sb2Se3. The formation of Sb2O3 at 255  cm1 revealed the sensitivity of the SD films to air. The SD films were much more sensitive to oxidation than TE films. The findings not only contribute to advancing optical PCMs but also provide a new alternative to conventional PVD methods for the fabrication, processing, and characterization of Sb2Se3 PCM films.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Code and Data Availability

The sample was created in-house using a melt-quench technique with commercially available elemental materials. The drop-casting technique has been clearly illustrated here as well as in other references. The fabrication of microheater array devices is achievable through established photonic foundry services, and the hardware and software designs of the characterization platform are publicly accessible.

Acknowledgments

Funding support was provided by NSF (Grant Nos. 2132929, 2225968, and 2225967). Dr. Schwarz acknowledges support provided from Ursinus College’s faculty flex funding, research grant and the Pearlstine Faculty Fellowship Award. B. Mills acknowledges support provided by the Draper Scholar Program.

References

1. 

S. Raoux et al., “Phase change materials and phase change memory,” MRS Bull., 39 703 –710 https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2014.139 MRSBEA 0883-7694 (2014). Google Scholar

2. 

Z. Wang et al., “Resistive switching materials for information processing,” Nat. Rev. Mater., 5 173 –195 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0159-3 (2020). Google Scholar

3. 

S. Wei, P. Lucas and C. A. Angell, “Phase-change materials: the view from the liquid phase and themetallicity parameter,” MRS Bull., 44 691 –698 https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2019.207 MRSBEA 0883-7694 (2019). Google Scholar

4. 

Z. Fang, “Non-volatile programmable photonics based on phase change materials,” (2023). Google Scholar

5. 

W. Zhang et al., “Designing crystallization in phase-change materials for universal memory and neuro-inspired computing,” Nat. Rev. Mater., 4 150 –168 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0076-x (2019). Google Scholar

6. 

R. E. Simpson, J. K. W. Yang and J. Hu, “Are phase change materials ideal for programmable photonics? Opinion,” Opt. Mater. Express, 12 2368 –2372 https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.456895 (2022). Google Scholar

7. 

D. Tripathi et al., “Recent developments in chalcogenide phase change material-based nanophotonics,” Nonotechnology, 34 502001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/acf1a7 (2023). Google Scholar

8. 

C. L. Hassam et al., “Robust, transparent hybrid thin films of phase-change material Sb2S3 prepared by electrophoretic deposition,” ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 4 9891 –9901 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c01899 (2021). Google Scholar

9. 

M. Delaney et al., “Nonvolatile programmable silicon photonics using an ultralow-loss Sb2Se3 phase change material,” Sci. Adv., 7 eabg3500 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg3500 STAMCV 1468-6996 (2021). Google Scholar

10. 

W. Jia, R. Menon and B. Sensale-Rodigue, “Unique prospects of phase change material Sb2Se3 for ultra-compact reconfigurable nanophotonic devices,” Opt. Mater. Express, 11 3007 –3014 https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.435979 (2021). Google Scholar

11. 

C. Rios et al., “Phase change materials for optics and photonics: feature issue introduction,” Opt. Mater. Express, 12 4284 –4286 https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.474034 (2022). Google Scholar

12. 

C. Popescu et al., “An open-source multi-functional testing platform for optical phase change materials,” Small Sci., 3 2300098 https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202300098 (2023). Google Scholar

13. 

S. A. Vitale et al., “Phase transformation and switching behavior of magnetron plasma sputtered Ge2Sb2Se4Te,” Adv. Photonics Res., 3 2200202 https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202200202 (2022). Google Scholar

14. 

G. Voutsas et al., “The crystal structure of antimony selenide, Sb2Se3,” Zeitschr. Kristallogr.-Crystal. Mater., 171 261 –268 https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1985.171.14.261 MATEG9 1996-1944 (1985). Google Scholar

15. 

M. Delaney et al., “A new family of ultralow loss reversible phase-change materials for photonic integrated circuits: Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 30 2002447 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002447 AFMDC6 1616-301X (2020). Google Scholar

16. 

T. Ju et al., “Enhanced photovoltaic performance of solution-processed Sb2Se3 thin film solar cells by optimizing device structure,” Curr. Appl. Phys., 20 282 –287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2019.11.018 1567-1739 (2020). Google Scholar

17. 

C. Ríos et al., “Ultra-compact nonvolatile phase shifter based on electrically reprogrammable transparent phase change materials,” PhotoniX, 3 26 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43074-022-00070-4 (2022). Google Scholar

18. 

D. Lawson et al., “Time-resolved reversible optical switching of the ultralow-loss phase change material Sb2Se3,” J. Opt., 24 064013 https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ac5ece JOOPDB 0150-536X (2022). Google Scholar

19. 

D. S. Cuz et al., “Structural, optical and morphological characterization of Sb2S3 thin films grown by physical vapor deposition,” in 18th Int. Conf. Electr. Eng., Comput. Sci. and Autom. Control (CCE), (2021). Google Scholar

20. 

R. Jakomin et al., “Advances on Sb2Se3 solar cells fabricated by physical vapor deposition techniques,” Solar, 3 566 –595 https://doi.org/10.3390/solar3040031 (2023). Google Scholar

21. 

A. Dutta et al., “Tunable optoelectronic properties of radio frequency sputter-deposited Sb2Se3 thin films: role of growth angle and thickness,” Sol. Energy, 194 716 –723 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.016 SRENA4 0038-092X (2019). Google Scholar

22. 

Y.-Z. Li et al., “Sb2Se3 thin films fabricated by thermal evaporation deposition using the powder prepared via mechanical alloying,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 358 1013 –1016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.026 SCTEEJ 0257-8972 (2019). Google Scholar

23. 

A. H. H. Al-Obeidi and B. K. H. Al-Maiyaly, in 1st Diyala Int. Conf. for Pure and Appl. Sci.: ICPAS2021, AIP Conf. Proc., (2023). Google Scholar

24. 

G. C. Chern and I. Lauks, “Spin coated amorphous chalcogenide films: structural characterization,” J. Appl. Phys., 54 2701 –2705 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.332294 JAPIAU 0021-8979 (1983). Google Scholar

25. 

Y. Zha, M. Waldmann and C. B. Arnold, “A review on solution processing of chalcogenide glasses for optical components,” Opt. Mater. Express, 3 1259 https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.3.001259 (2013). Google Scholar

26. 

C. McCarthy et al., “Solution-phase conversion of bulk metal oxides to metal chalcogenides using a simple thiol-amine solvent mixture,” Angew. Chem., 127 8498 –8501 https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201503353 ANCEAD 0044-8249 (2015). Google Scholar

27. 

S. Song et al., “Spin-coating of Ge23Sb7S70 chalcogenide glass thin films,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 355 2272 –2278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.07.015 JNCSBJ 0022-3093 (2009). Google Scholar

28. 

Y. Zou et al., “Solution processing and resist-free nanoimprint fabrication of thin film chalcogenide glass devices: inorganic-organic hybrid photonic integration,” Adv. Opt. Mater., 2 759 –764 https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400068 2195-1071 (2014). Google Scholar

29. 

S. Slang et al., “Mechanism of the dissolution of As–S chalcogenide glass in n-butylamine and its influence on the structure of spin coated layers,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 426 125 –131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.07.009 JNCSBJ 0022-3093 (2015). Google Scholar

30. 

J. Wilkinson, “Characterization and optimization of solution-derived chalcogenide thin films,” (2012). Google Scholar

31. 

H. Khan et al., “Solution processing of chalcogenide glasses: a facile path towards functional integration,” Opt. Mater., 119 111332 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111332 OMATET 0925-3467 (2021). Google Scholar

32. 

C. Tsay, Y. Zha and C. B. Arnold, “Solution-processed chalcogenide glass for integrated single-mode mid-infrared waveguides,” Opt. Express, 18 26744 –26753 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.026744 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2010). Google Scholar

33. 

Y. Zha et al., “Inverted-rib chalcogenide waveguides by solution process,” ACS Photonics, 1 153 –157 https://doi.org/10.1021/ph400107s (2014). Google Scholar

34. 

C. Tsay et al., “Mid-infrared characterization of solution-processed As2S3 chalcogenide glass waveguides,” Opt. Express, 18 15523 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.015523 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2010). Google Scholar

35. 

N. Carlie et al., “Integrated chalcogenide waveguide resonators for mid-IR sensing: leveraging material properties to meet fabrication challenges,” Opt. Express, 18 26728 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.026728 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2010). Google Scholar

36. 

J. W. Choi et al., “Nonlinear characterization of GeSbS chalcogenide glass waveguides,” Sci. Rep., 6 39234 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39234 SRCEC3 2045-2322 (2016). Google Scholar

37. 

Y. R. Wang et al., “Electronic and optical switching of solution-phase deposited SnSe2 phase change memory material,” J. Appl. Phys., 109 113506 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3587187 JAPIAU 0021-8979 (2011). Google Scholar

38. 

A. Simon et al., “Introduction of chalcogenide glasses to additive manufacturing: nanoparticle ink formulation, inkjet printing, and phase change devices fabrication,” Sci. Rep., 11 14311 (2021). Google Scholar

39. 

D. B. Mitzi et al., “Solution-based processing of the phase-change material KSb5S8,” Chem. Mater., 18 6278 –6282 https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0619510 CMATEX 0897-4756 (2006). Google Scholar

40. 

P. N. Bartlett et al., “Non-aqueous electrodeposition of functional semiconducting metal chalcogenides: Ge2Sb2Te5 phase change memory,” Mater. Horiz., 2 420 –426 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MH00030K (2015). Google Scholar

41. 

V. M. Koch et al., “Sb2Se3 thin-film growth by solution atomic layer deposition,” Chem. Mater., 34 9392 –9401 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01550 CMATEX 0897-4756 (2022). Google Scholar

42. 

D. Milliron, S. Raoux and R. Shelby, “Solution-phase deposition and nanopatterning of GeSbSe phase-change materials,” Nat. Mater., 6 352 –356 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1887 NMAACR 1476-1122 (2007). Google Scholar

43. 

C. L. McCarthy and R. L. Brutchey, “Solution processing of chalcogenide materials using thiol–amine “alkahest” solvent systems,” Chem. Commun., 53 4888 –4902 https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC02226C (2017). Google Scholar

44. 

D. H. Webber et al., “Facile dissolution of selenium and tellurium in a thiol–amine solvent mixture under ambient conditions,” Chem. Sci., 5 2498 –2502 https://doi.org/10.1039/c4sc00749b 1478-6524 (2014). Google Scholar

45. 

D. H. Webber and R. L. Brutchey, “Alkahest for V2VI3 chalcogenides: dissolution of nine bulk semiconductors in a diamine-dithiol solvent mixture,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135 15722 –15725 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4084336 JACSAT 0002-7863 (2013). Google Scholar

46. 

C. J. Zhang et al., “Broadband transparent optical phase change materials for high-performance nonvolatile photonics,” Nat. Commun., 10 4279 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12196-4 (2019). Google Scholar

47. 

J. Hu et al., “Fabrication and testing of planar chalcogenide waveguide integrated microfluidic sensor,” Opt. Express, 15 2307 –2314 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.002307 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2007). Google Scholar

48. 

J. D. Musgraves et al., “Comparison of the optical, thermal and structural properties of Ge–Sb–S thin films deposited using thermal evaporation and pulsed laser deposition techniques,” Acta Mater., 59 5032 –5039 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.060 ACMAFD 1359-6454 (2011). Google Scholar

49. 

A. Kumar et al., “Raman spectroscopy and in situ XRD probing of the thermal decomposition of Sb2Se3 thin films,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 125 19858 –19865 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05047 JPCCCK 1932-7447 (2021). Google Scholar

Biography

Rashi Sharma is a postdoctoral scientist at the University of Central Florida (UCF) in Orlando, Florida, working in CREOL, the College for Optics and Photonics. She received her PhD in chemistry from the UCF in 2018. She is the author of 14 journal papers and has written one book chapter. Her current research interests include engineering of IR transparent glass and glass ceramics. She is a member of SPIE.

Casey Schwarz is an associate professor of physics and chair of the Physics and Astronomy Department at Ursinus College in Collegeville, Pennsylvania. She received her PhD in physics from the UCF in 2012 and served as a postdoctoral scholar in chemistry and CREOL, the College for Optics and Photonics at UCF. Her research interests include laser writing of new materials, the development and design of optical devices, bioactive glasses, and undergraduate education.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Rashi Sharma, Casey Schwarz, Daniel Wiedeman, Eric T. S. Bissell, Brian Mills, Marie Sykes, Jasper Stackawitz, Jake Klucinec, Dennis Callahan, JueJun Hu, Parag Banerjee, and Kathleen Richardson "Solution-based Sb2Se3 thin films for microphotonics," Journal of Optical Microsystems 4(3), 031203 (25 May 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031203
Received: 29 December 2023; Accepted: 2 April 2024; Published: 25 May 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Antimony

Selenium

Thin films

Particles

Raman spectroscopy

Scanning electron microscopy

Film thickness

Back to Top