Evaluation of the tactical utility of compressed imagery

John M. Irvine; Barbara A. Eckstein; Robert A. Hummel; Richard J. Peters; Rhonda L. Ritzel

doi:10.1117/1.1475740

1 June 2002 Evaluation of the tactical utility of compressed imagery

John M. Irvine, Barbara A. Eckstein, Robert A. Hummel, Richard J. Peters, Rhonda L. Ritzel

Author Affiliations +

Optical Engineering, Vol. 41, Issue 6, (June 2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1475740

The effects of compression on image utility are assessed based on manual exploitation performed by military imagery analysts (IAs). The original, uncompressed synthetic aperture radar imagery and compressed products are rated for the Radar National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale (NIIRS), image features and sensor artifacts, and target detection and recognition. Images were compressed via standard JPEG compression, single-scale intelligent bandwidth compression (IBC), and wavelet/trellis-coded quantization (W/TCQ) at 50-to-1 and 100-to-1 ratios. We find that the utility of the compressed imagery differs only slightly from the uncompressed imagery, with the exception of the JPEG products. Otherwise, both the 50-to-1 and 100-to-1 compressed imagery appear similar in terms of image quality. Radar NIIRS indicates that even 100-to-1 compression using IBC or W/TCQ has minimal impact on imagery intelligence value. A slight loss in performance occurs for vehicle counting and identification tasks. These findings suggest that both single-scale IBC and W/TCQ compression techniques have matured to a point that they could provide value to the tactical user. Additional assessments may verify the practical limits of compression for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data and address the transition to a field environment.

©(2002) Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

Citation Download Citation

John M. Irvine, Barbara A. Eckstein, Robert A. Hummel, Richard J. Peters, and Rhonda L. Ritzel "Evaluation of the tactical utility of compressed imagery," Optical Engineering 41(6), (1 June 2002). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1475740

Published: 1 June 2002

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE