Dr. Davit Aghayan Profile

Dr. Davit Aghayan

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

Proceedings Article | 22 October 2024 Paper

Enhancing liver resection planning through comprehensive volumetry analysis

Ruoyan Meng, Davit Aghayan, Faouzi Alaya Cheikh, Rafael Palomar

Proceedings Volume 13274, 132741M (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3038556

KEYWORDS: Resection, Liver, Voxels, Surgery, Image segmentation, Tumors, Image processing, Anatomy, 3D modeling, Visualization

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 3 April 2024 Presentation + Paper

Using NURBS for virtual resections in liver surgery planning: a comparative usability study

Gabriella d'Albenzio, Rebecca Hisey, Dilakshan Srikanthan, Tamas Ungi, Andras Lasso, Davit Aghayan, Gabor Fichtinger, Rafael Palomar

Proceedings Volume 12927, 129270Z (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3006486

KEYWORDS: Resection, Liver, Surgery, Deformation, 3D modeling, Medical imaging, Liver cancer

Read Abstract +

PURPOSE: Accurate preoperative planning is crucial for liver resection surgery due to the complex anatomical structures and variations among patients. The need of virtual resections utilizing deformable surfaces presents a promising approach for effective liver surgery planning. However, the range of available surface definitions poses the question of which definition is most appropriate. METHODS: The study compares the use of NURBS and B´ezier surfaces for the definition of virtual resections through a usability study, where 25 participants (19 biomedical researchers and 6 liver surgeons) completed tasks using varying numbers of control points driving surface deformations and different surface types. Specifically, participants aim to perform virtual liver resections using 16 and 9 control points for NURBS and B´ezier surfaces. The goal is to assess whether they can attain an optimal resection plan, effectively balancing complete tumor removal with the preservation of enough healthy liver tissue and function to prevent postoperative liver dysfunction, despite working with fewer control points and different surface properties. Accuracy was assessed using Hausdorff distance and average surface distance. A survey based on the NASA Task Load Index measured user performance and preferences. RESULTS: NURBS surfaces exhibit improved accuracy and consistency over B´ezier surfaces, with lower average surface distance and variability of results. The 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance indicates the robustness of NURBS surfaces for the task. Task completion time was influenced by control point dimensions, favoring NURBS 3x3 (vs. 4x4) surfaces for a balanced accuracy-efficiency trade-off. Finally, the survey results indicated participants preferred NURBS surfaces over B´ezier, emphasizing the improved performance, surface manipulation, and reduced effort. CONCLUSION: The integration of NURBS surfaces into liver resection planning offers a promising advancement. This study demonstrates their superiority in accuracy, efficiency, and user preference compared to B´ezier surfaces. The findings underscore the potential of NURBS-based preoperative planning tools to enhance surgical outcomes in liver resection procedures.

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years