Image registration requires a step of detection and matching of primitives. This phase is important to obtain reliable registration. In this paper, we mainly focus on geometric registration methods which are based on the extraction and matching of distinctive feature points in images. Several methods such as SIFT, SURF, BRIEF, BRISK, ORB, FREAK and FRIF, are already proposed. In this paper, we present a comparative study of feature detector and descripts methods for registration which can be classified according to the type of descriptor and can be local classical or binary. We have presented, through this study, the difference between geometric methods of descriptor leveling as well as points of interest detector used and which have an influence on the resetting registration result. We can see that each method has weak points as well as strong points. The major difference is the level of invariance to the type of processing and the temporal complexity.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.