As the most widely used clustering algorithm nowadays, the K-means algorithm has been applied in diverse fields. It is characterized with a fast calculation speed and a simple algorithm. It is, however, nonetheless beset by a number of problems. One difficulty is that choosing the starting center at random will have a negative influence on the clustering result. Second, outliers are susceptible to the K-means algorithm. Third, such an algorithm still has a significant time cost. To address these concerns, this work introduces the AGK Adaptive-GK method, which takes use of the grid clustering technique's benefits. Our AGK can accurately identify an initial center, increase the accuracy of the standard K-means method, and lower the algorithm's computation complexity. We did a thorough study of our AGK on a variety of data sets, and the findings show that it is accurate and efficient.
KEYWORDS: Social networks, Fuzzy logic, Distributed interactive simulations, Mathematical modeling, Francium, Computer simulations, Matrices, Information technology, Data analysis, Software development
In the traditional methods for wisdom of crowd, the measure and improvement of crowd consensus is very important. In the process of crowd consensus measure and improvement, it is necessary to modify the decision-maker information that does not meet the consensus threshold. And in the traditional methods for wisdom of crowd, decision-makers do not exchange information and communication. In order to avoid the above problems, this paper proposes the method for wisdom of crowd based on the evolution of decision makers in social network. The method is mainly divided into three parts: Firstly, the decision-makers compare the alternatives in pairs according to their own knowledge and experience to get the evaluation results. Secondly, the bisecting K-means clustering algorithm is used to group the alternatives according to the evaluation results of the decision makers, and the French-Harary-DeGroot model is used to simulate the opinions of the decision makers in the crowd. After negotiation, the consensus is reached. Finally, the opinions of each group are gathered and the best alternative is selected. At the end of the paper, the experiment is used to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.